2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating residual dyke resistance using the Random Material Point Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the random material point method (RMPM; see Wang et al, 2016a;Liu et al, 2019;Remmerswaal et al, 2021) initially proposed by Fenton and Vanmarcke (1990) to generate RFs for a finite-element mesh (RFEM), we combined this approach with the codes proposed by Räss et al (2019b) to generate an isotropic peak cohesion field to demonstrate its influence on the mechanical behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the random material point method (RMPM; see Wang et al, 2016a;Liu et al, 2019;Remmerswaal et al, 2021) initially proposed by Fenton and Vanmarcke (1990) to generate RFs for a finite-element mesh (RFEM), we combined this approach with the codes proposed by Räss et al (2019b) to generate an isotropic peak cohesion field to demonstrate its influence on the mechanical behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of quasi ‐static analysis the acceleration of the body is assumed to be zero, which reduces (1) to that of the AMPLE framework 29 . The surface traction term in (1) is neglected as the focus of this article is on the stability of the MPM rather than the imposition of surface tractions within the method, which is a research question in its own right (for example, see Bing et al 31 or Remmerswaal 32 ). We also restrict the Dirichlet boundary conditions to coincide with the background grid as the imposition of general Dirichlet constraints is another active area of research 31,33,34 …”
Section: Materials Point Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among different methods, the commonly used first-order reliability method (FORM) [2] and Second-order reliability method (SORM) [3] are only applicable for relatively simple engineering problems. Monte Carlo simulation (MCS)-based methods [4][5][6] can provide an unbiased estimation of the failure probability (P f ) and are not limited by the implications or complexity of performance function. However, MCS methods often require extensive computational cost for the performance function (usually more than 10 5 times [7]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%