2023
DOI: 10.3390/educsci13121213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Reflective Writing in Pre-Service Teachers: The Potential of a Mixed-Methods Approach

Chengming Zhang,
Jessica Schießl,
Lea Plößl
et al.

Abstract: Reflective writing is a relevant aspect of pre-service teachers’ professionalization. Evaluating reflective writing in teacher education is demanding due to a shortage of resources. Hence, this study explores the practical possibilities of evaluating reflective writing using a mixed-methods approach to analyze reflective writing from 198 pre-service teachers at a German university. We used qualitative content analysis, computational linguistic approaches, and BERTopic. Results of qualitative content analysis r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding is contrary to pertinent literature stating that students mainly reflect on a descriptive level [ 15 , 35 , 61 , 62 ] but is consistent with previous studies indicating that the highest level of reflection, critical reflection , is unlikely to occur frequently [ 57 ]. That students commonly do not reach the level of critical reflection was described in previous studies that analysed reflection exercises in health professions [ 63 65 ] as well as in other disciplines [ 61 , 66 68 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our finding is contrary to pertinent literature stating that students mainly reflect on a descriptive level [ 15 , 35 , 61 , 62 ] but is consistent with previous studies indicating that the highest level of reflection, critical reflection , is unlikely to occur frequently [ 57 ]. That students commonly do not reach the level of critical reflection was described in previous studies that analysed reflection exercises in health professions [ 63 65 ] as well as in other disciplines [ 61 , 66 68 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, there is broad evidence that ongoing feedback can improve reflection [ 70 , 73 , 74 ], and we plan to incorporate it into our subsequent courses. Since feedback given by lecturers requires resources, additional future possibilities could be the complementary use of automated feedback and more advanced artificial intelligence technologies to analyse and assess reflective writing, as well as to provide personalised feedback to students [ 68 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%