Recommender Systems Handbook 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Recommender Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
167
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
167
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second evaluation method is the user study: where a group of users will be asked to use the system in a particular controlled environment and give their feelings about the system. Thirdly, the systems can be evaluated when used by many real users over an extended period, normally without prior thinking of the experiment [32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second evaluation method is the user study: where a group of users will be asked to use the system in a particular controlled environment and give their feelings about the system. Thirdly, the systems can be evaluated when used by many real users over an extended period, normally without prior thinking of the experiment [32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-validation is one of the popular ways of selecting the test data, where the dataset will be split into some equal partitions, and every partition will be used in turn as the test data. We chose cross-validation so that more data in the ranking algorithm will be used, and the effect of variation in the training set will be taken into consideration [32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It determines the efficient way of recommendation and can go beyond for accuracy, coverage, risk factor; adaptability etc. The accuracy is not enough for the need of recommended quality [9].…”
Section: Evaluating Recommender Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e mise-en-scène dataset contains ve feature values extracted according to the procedure described in Section 2.2.2. In the o ine evaluation we computed recommendation quality with respect to: precision, diversity, novelty and coverage [18].…”
Section: Study A: O Line Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%