1977
DOI: 10.1080/00405847709542732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating reading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A related concern is the question of how reading ability, and reading instruction, should be evaluated. While many, and school system officials in particular, still support the use of standardized tests, researchers increasingly take the diametrically opposed position that children's reading should be assessed in its occurrence in natural settings, by observing, listening, and conversing with children as they read (King, 1978;Barr, 1975;Griffin, 1978). The debate surrounding approaches to reading and its evaluation underlines the fact that teachers here, as elsewhere, work in an uncertain intellectual environment.…”
Section: Conceptions Of Reading and Textmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A related concern is the question of how reading ability, and reading instruction, should be evaluated. While many, and school system officials in particular, still support the use of standardized tests, researchers increasingly take the diametrically opposed position that children's reading should be assessed in its occurrence in natural settings, by observing, listening, and conversing with children as they read (King, 1978;Barr, 1975;Griffin, 1978). The debate surrounding approaches to reading and its evaluation underlines the fact that teachers here, as elsewhere, work in an uncertain intellectual environment.…”
Section: Conceptions Of Reading and Textmentioning
confidence: 92%