1971
DOI: 10.1001/jama.218.4.564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating quality of patient care. A strategy relating outcome and process assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

1976
1976
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…l3~16 Anderson and associates, using a modified version of Williamson's outcomes-oriented assessment method, 17 compared estimated outcomes with actual measured outcomes for stroke patients who participated in a rehabilitation program. 1819 This evaluation of the quality of medical care focuses on acute stroke patients cared for in a comprehensive stroke treatment center in a university-affiliated Veterans Administration medical center.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…l3~16 Anderson and associates, using a modified version of Williamson's outcomes-oriented assessment method, 17 compared estimated outcomes with actual measured outcomes for stroke patients who participated in a rehabilitation program. 1819 This evaluation of the quality of medical care focuses on acute stroke patients cared for in a comprehensive stroke treatment center in a university-affiliated Veterans Administration medical center.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Изучение исходов заболевания и определение эффе-ктивности назначенной терапии в ревматологии, как и в медицине в целом, являются одними из основных задач клинициста [14]. В последние годы отмечен рост внимания к проблеме Пн, что выражается в большом количестве ста-тей и описаний отдельных клинических случаев, публику-ющихся в отечественных и зарубежных изданиях.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…A substantial number of these efforts were spawned by the academic health quality movement. This was launched with a series of articles that began to outline the deficiencies in the delivery of healthcare, which prompted numerous and multidimensional efforts towards healthcare quality improvement [2][3][4][5][6]. These included the re-engineering and restructuring of systems of healthcare delivery, the encouragement of peer review, and the incentivizing of competition among providers and organizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%