2018 IEEE International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions (ICARSC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icarsc.2018.8374166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating pruned object detection networks for real-time robot vision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absolute weight sum technique was successful in reducing the computational cost for VGG-16 [19] by up to 34% and ResNet-110 [20] by up to 38% with no significant loss in accuracy [17]. We have previously shown that pruning methods based on Taylor expansion did not outperform an approach based on the absolute weight sum [7].…”
Section: Convolutionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The absolute weight sum technique was successful in reducing the computational cost for VGG-16 [19] by up to 34% and ResNet-110 [20] by up to 38% with no significant loss in accuracy [17]. We have previously shown that pruning methods based on Taylor expansion did not outperform an approach based on the absolute weight sum [7].…”
Section: Convolutionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, pruning has been evaluated for image classification problems but not for object detection (as far as the authors are aware) except for our own work [7]. There is reason to suspect object detection networks might be less amenable to pruning as more information is carried through the network to the output layer.…”
Section: Convolutionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations