2018
DOI: 10.1080/00288330.2018.1487454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating practical macrophyte control tools on small agricultural waterways in Canterbury, New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst unsurprising, this is a non-trivial result because management of shade is often seen as a key element in rehabilitating and restoring degraded streams [65,66]. Shading can reduce proliferations of filamentous green algae and macrophytes that contribute to impaired ecological status [67,68]. For example, excessive autotrophic biomass can increase ecosystem respiration in the water-column and interstitial spaces of the streambed [69,70], potentially leading to adverse impacts on pollution-sensitive EPT (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera) species through reductions in dissolved oxygen concentrations [71].…”
Section: Effects Of Shading By Forested Riparian Buffersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst unsurprising, this is a non-trivial result because management of shade is often seen as a key element in rehabilitating and restoring degraded streams [65,66]. Shading can reduce proliferations of filamentous green algae and macrophytes that contribute to impaired ecological status [67,68]. For example, excessive autotrophic biomass can increase ecosystem respiration in the water-column and interstitial spaces of the streambed [69,70], potentially leading to adverse impacts on pollution-sensitive EPT (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera) species through reductions in dissolved oxygen concentrations [71].…”
Section: Effects Of Shading By Forested Riparian Buffersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controlled experiments that compared responses of multiple SAV species to different benthic mats showed varying responses across species as a result of differences in morphology and the plant's ability to pass through the matting material (Hofstra and Clayton 2012). Additionally, studies in stream systems with emergent species have observed high rates of reinfestation after barriers are removed, and colonization on top of barriers when sediment accumulates (Eichler et al 1995;Laitala et al 2012;Collins et al 2019). Benthic barriers can also harm invertebrate communities and interfere with nutrient and oxygen exchange processes where water and sediment meet (Ussery et al 1997).…”
Section: Physical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For narrow floodplain waterbodies, such as streams, drains and side arms, water and habitat quality conditions can be improved through the targeted planting of riparian vegetation on northern banks (e.g., to provide shade, stabilization and organic carbon inputs). Collins et al (2019) assessed shading tolerances of New Zealand native and non-native macrophyte assemblages and highlighted that providing 80% shade over the full channel reduced macrophyte growth from 50% to 17% cover. This level of growth under shaded conditions can provide water conveyance functions without the need for annual drain excavation (where macrophyte growth is the issue of concern), reducing sediment and nutrient mobilization to downstream waterbodies, while native macrophytes are favored at higher shade levels thereby improving biodiversity values of modified or managed watercourses (Ellawala Kankanamge et al, 2019).…”
Section: Enhanced Land Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%