2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Power and Type 1 Error in Large Pedigree Analyses of Binary Traits

Abstract: Studying population isolates with large, complex pedigrees has many advantages for discovering genetic susceptibility loci; however, statistical analyses can be computationally challenging. Allelic association tests need to be corrected for relatedness among study participants, and linkage analyses require subdividing and simplifying the pedigree structures. We have extended GenomeSIMLA to simulate SNP data in complex pedigree structures based on an Amish pedigree to generate the same structure and distributio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pedigree, which explained the known relationships between the founder brothers and the Robinson Crusoe validation cohort, included 288 individuals (321 bits, where a bit is defined as twice the number of non-founders—the number of founders) and so had to be broken into smaller sets for linkage analyses. This segmentation process discards information and can reduce the power to detect linkage if individuals sharing the linked chromosome segment are split between sub-pedigrees [ 56 ]. Lastly, since we hypothesize that SLI in this population has a complex genetic basis and involves incomplete and a high phenocopy frequency, it is possible that the power to detect linkage is insufficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pedigree, which explained the known relationships between the founder brothers and the Robinson Crusoe validation cohort, included 288 individuals (321 bits, where a bit is defined as twice the number of non-founders—the number of founders) and so had to be broken into smaller sets for linkage analyses. This segmentation process discards information and can reduce the power to detect linkage if individuals sharing the linked chromosome segment are split between sub-pedigrees [ 56 ]. Lastly, since we hypothesize that SLI in this population has a complex genetic basis and involves incomplete and a high phenocopy frequency, it is possible that the power to detect linkage is insufficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, this method allows for the inclusion of samples with unknown or unclear affection status, increasing the overall sample size. Type 1 error rates for the method are not inflated when used for the Amish [ 29 ]. This association test was used for both stages of the study, analysis of sequence variants and follow-up genotyping.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By genotyping the prioritized variants in over 1,100 samples, the power limitations of the screening population may be overcome and associations may be detected. Previous studies in this Amish population investigated this software’s power to detect associations [ 29 ]. For dominant and additive models, there was greater than 90% power to detect an association at p < 0.05 when the simulated odds ratio (OR) was at least 2 and the minor allele frequency was held constant at 0.2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essential tremor (ET) is a movement disorder characterized by bilateral postural tremor, typically in the upper limbs, and sometimes comorbid with other movement disorders such as PD and dystonia. ET is believed to be a central nervous disorder arising from an oscillating source in the brain …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ET is believed to be a central nervous disorder arising from an oscillating source in the brain. 2 ET is one of the most common movement disorders in adults and occurs in all ethnic groups. Overall, the prevalence of ET in the general population is 0.9% 3 ; however, prevalence increases with age.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%