2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Population Receptive Field Estimation Frameworks in Terms of Robustness and Reproducibility

Abstract: Within vision research retinotopic mapping and the more general receptive field estimation approach constitute not only an active field of research in itself but also underlie a plethora of interesting applications. This necessitates not only good estimation of population receptive fields (pRFs) but also that these receptive fields are consistent across time rather than dynamically changing. It is therefore of interest to maximize the accuracy with which population receptive fields can be estimated in a functi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus far the only study related to this topic suggests high stability of pRF parameters between scanning sessions in a small sample (n=3) and across visual areas (Senden et al, 2014). Here we compare mapping reliability in a larger sample and for individual visual areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far the only study related to this topic suggests high stability of pRF parameters between scanning sessions in a small sample (n=3) and across visual areas (Senden et al, 2014). Here we compare mapping reliability in a larger sample and for individual visual areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stimulus is an important contributor to the accuracy with which population receptive fields can be estimated ( Senden et al, 2014 ). In the present study, a novel multi-scale bar stimulus is used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within each orientation the sequence of steps (and hence of the locations) was randomized (cf. Senden et al 2014). Each orientation was presented six times.…”
Section: Perception Runmentioning
confidence: 99%