2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.06.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating plastic anisotropy in two aluminum alloys processed by equal-channel angular pressing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 8 shows the results of tests conducted to evaluate the extent of any plastic anisotropy by testing compression samples of (a) Al- Using Severe Plastic Deformation for the Processing of Advanced Engineering Materials 1617 6061 and (b) Al-7034 under the same conditions at 298 K but using samples pressed through 6 passes in ECAP and then cut with orientations in the X, Y or Z directions. 51) Inspection of these two sets of curves shows there is no significant plastic anisotropy in either alloy after processing by ECAP and it is reasonable to conclude there is an overall homogeneity throughout both materials.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties At Low Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Figure 8 shows the results of tests conducted to evaluate the extent of any plastic anisotropy by testing compression samples of (a) Al- Using Severe Plastic Deformation for the Processing of Advanced Engineering Materials 1617 6061 and (b) Al-7034 under the same conditions at 298 K but using samples pressed through 6 passes in ECAP and then cut with orientations in the X, Y or Z directions. 51) Inspection of these two sets of curves shows there is no significant plastic anisotropy in either alloy after processing by ECAP and it is reasonable to conclude there is an overall homogeneity throughout both materials.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties At Low Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…11 is for the as-received unprocessed alloy and the lower curves are for samples processed through 1, 2 and 6 passes of ECAP: the designation Z direction refers to cutting the samples perpendicular to the flow direction and perpendicular to the upper surface of the ECAP billet. [134] Figure 11 shows also that there is a lower rate of strain hardening after yielding when processing by ECAP.…”
Section: Weakening By Spdmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Stress-strain curves for Al-7034 showing the weakening through increasing numbers of ECAP passes. [134] Figure 12. Weakening in Zn-22% Al with increasing numbers of HPT turns.…”
Section: Figure Captionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrafine-grained (UFG) materials typically exhibit average grain sizes in the range of 100 nm to 1 µm. Compared to their conventional, coarse-grained counterparts, these materials often exhibit a significantly increased strength [1][2][3][4]. The majority of previous investigations have been done on materials processed by ECAP in laboratory scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%