2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00371-018-1545-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating physical and rendered material appearance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Filip and Kolafová (2019) recently performed an analysis on perceptual attributes in real-world materials in which they assessed several tactile and visual attributes and evaluated the relationship between such attributes and different material categories. They also compared the perception of such material attributes when viewing a computer graphics rendering to those when viewing a physical sample of the same material ( Filip et al., 2018 ). They found that participants evaluated perceptual attributes more consistently between these two modalities for familiar materials than for materials with random structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Filip and Kolafová (2019) recently performed an analysis on perceptual attributes in real-world materials in which they assessed several tactile and visual attributes and evaluated the relationship between such attributes and different material categories. They also compared the perception of such material attributes when viewing a computer graphics rendering to those when viewing a physical sample of the same material ( Filip et al., 2018 ). They found that participants evaluated perceptual attributes more consistently between these two modalities for familiar materials than for materials with random structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acquired measured data is normally high-dimensional, hence, for dense sampling, it is a time-consuming task which requires high memory footprints. CuRet [29], Cornell reflectance data [30], MERL [31], UTIA [32,33], Bonn [34] and RGL-EPFL [35] databases are publicly provided measured reflectance data sets. These databases offer an extensive range of measured materials in different formats and resolutions.…”
Section: Surface Reflectance Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another BRDF database which has many anisotropic BRDFs is from UTIA. They provided 150 coarsely sampled BRDFs[83] and several dense anisotropic measurements[33,84,85]. A learning-based BRDF sampling proposed by Nielsen et al[41] provided 8 reconstructed BRDFs using 20 samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some approaches approximate fabrics as 2D sheets. Wang et al [2008] and Dong et al [2010] leverage spatially varying BRDF (SVBRDFs) based on tabulated normal distributions to represent the appearance of captured materials including embroidered silk satin, whereas others focused on appearance modeling in terms of bidirectional texture functions (BTFs) [Dana et al, 1997;Filip et al, 2018].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%