2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03319-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating pediatric spinal low-grade gliomas: a 30-year retrospective analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 ). In previous published works [ 4 , 6 , 8 , 23 , 36 , 40 ] where the two groups were not differentiated, the median age for spinal LGG ranged from 6 to 14 years. With the exception of age at the time of diagnosis, spinal PAs and DLGNTs show no clear demographic or clinical differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 ). In previous published works [ 4 , 6 , 8 , 23 , 36 , 40 ] where the two groups were not differentiated, the median age for spinal LGG ranged from 6 to 14 years. With the exception of age at the time of diagnosis, spinal PAs and DLGNTs show no clear demographic or clinical differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a series of 32 DLGNT with DNA-methylation profiling, the 1p deletion was observed in 100% of cases and thus was considered an essential diagnostic criteria in the 2021 WHO classification [ 48 ]. However, very little cytogenetic data (only 3 cases reported with 1p19q codeletion) concerning chromosome 1 are available in existing literature (108 reported spinal PAs) (Supplementary Table 1, online resource) [ 4 , 6 , 8 , 23 , 24 , 36 , 40 ]. Moreover, there is no series in the literature comparing radiological features and clinical behaviors of these two histomolecular diagnoses in this spinal location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%