2010
DOI: 10.1177/0886368710374391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Pay-for-Performance Systems: Critical Issues for Implementation

Abstract: Most organizations use a merit pay or pay-for-performance system (PFP) to improve employee performance. Despite its popularity, a PFP system can be difficult to implement. Success depends on several issues. These include adequate funding, suitable job characteristics, and appropriate performance feedback. Moreover, even under the best circumstances, PFP systems may cause unintended consequences such as dysfunctional behavior, unethical conduct and even employment discrimination. Still, when the critical issues… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compensation portrays payment of the employees by the organization for the service rendered. Remuneration is the center of each work trade and it fills in as a characterizing normal for any business relationship (Glassman, Champagne &Zugelder 2010). The issue of remuneration is one of the fundamental parts of business that an organization must settle before getting the employees.…”
Section: Relationship Between Compensation and Employee Loyaltymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compensation portrays payment of the employees by the organization for the service rendered. Remuneration is the center of each work trade and it fills in as a characterizing normal for any business relationship (Glassman, Champagne &Zugelder 2010). The issue of remuneration is one of the fundamental parts of business that an organization must settle before getting the employees.…”
Section: Relationship Between Compensation and Employee Loyaltymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appraisal process commences with the establishment of an employee's goals and concludes with a formal meeting ("performance appraisal interview" or PAI) at which the supervisor provides feedback and rates the employee's job performance against the performance criteria (Aguinis, 2009). Feedback, especially negative feedback, can play an important role in facilitating performance improvements (Glassman, 2010;Heneman & Werner, 2005;Rynes, Gerhart & Parks 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physicians' satisfaction is highly associated with their job effectiveness, including quality of care and patients' health outcomes as well as patients' satisfaction with care (Halbesleben and Rathert 2008;Klein et al 2011). Accordingly, deterioration of job satisfaction as a result of increased workload and stress while trying to meet the performance criteria can be regarded as an unintended consequence of PBSP system (Glassman et al 2010;Weyer et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%