2018
DOI: 10.1080/02571862.2018.1465136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating parents for cane yield in sugarcane breeding using best linear unbiased prediction analysis of progeny data derived from family plots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Female × male variance (SCA) was highly significant and 24–57% higher than GCA, indicating the importance of SCA in sugarcane breeding. Currently, most sugarcane breeding programs use genetic and breeding values to select parents (Atkin et al., 2009; Mbuma et al., 2018b, 2020a). The highly significant SCA suggests that GCA alone was inadequate for predicting progeny cane yield and suggests the need for cross appraisal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Female × male variance (SCA) was highly significant and 24–57% higher than GCA, indicating the importance of SCA in sugarcane breeding. Currently, most sugarcane breeding programs use genetic and breeding values to select parents (Atkin et al., 2009; Mbuma et al., 2018b, 2020a). The highly significant SCA suggests that GCA alone was inadequate for predicting progeny cane yield and suggests the need for cross appraisal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed low R 2 , high CV, and residual variance. These values are characteristic of data from Stage I of sugarcane breeding (Mbuma et al, 2017(Mbuma et al, , 2018a(Mbuma et al, , 2018b(Mbuma et al, , 2020a(Mbuma et al, , 2020b. Trials in Stage I are planted to large numbers of progenies ranging from 25,000 to 50,000.…”
Section: Crop Sciencementioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An excellent sugarcane variety was always selected from hundreds of sugarcane combinations (Yang et al, 2011). High yield, high sucrose content, strong ratoon ability and multi-resistance were the breeding targets (Mbuma et al, 2018;Huang et al, 2016;Zhou et al, 2017). However, the most prominent problem encountered in conventional breeding was the narrow genetic basis and insufficient parental innovation, which greatly affects the selection of new breakthrough sugarcane varieties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, sucrose content on a family mean basis has been a highly prioritized selection criteria in the seedling and first line trial stages of our program. Family selection, in the seedling stage, is widely practiced to different extents in several countries including Australia (Cox & Stringer, 1998; Hogarth et al., 1990; Jackson et al., 1995a, 1995b; Kimbeng et al., 2000; Wei et al., 2022), the United States (Chang & Milligan, 1992a, 1992b; Milligan et al., 1990b; Tai et al., 2003), India (Shanthi et al., 2011; Shanthi et al., 2008), Brazil (Ferreira et al., 2022; Muetanene et al., 2023), and South Africa (Mbuma et al., 2018; Mbuma, 2016; Mbuma et al., 2020; Zhou, 2014; Zhou et al., 2013). Sucrose content is customarily used to assess family performance whereas individual seedling or clone selection within families relies on Brix, %, as measured using a hand‐held refractometer (Kimbeng & Cox, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%