2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating outsourcing risks in the pharmaceutical supply chain: Case of a multi-criteria combined fuzzy AHP-PROMETHEE approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, PROMETHEE II does a good job of ranking all risk factors, which facilitates risk comparison and identification of risks requiring special attention. Researchers apply fuzzy PROMETHEE to provide application novelty, for instance, Mokrini applied PROMETHEE combined with fuzzy theory to the risk assessment of pharmaceutical supply chain, providing a broader research idea [34]. Although showing many advantages and wider application, this method is qualitatively expressed and usually depends on opinions and experience of decision-maker and does not provide a method to determine the weight of evaluation criteria, hence, easily to be misunderstood by the vagueness of linguistic terms.…”
Section: Mcda Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, PROMETHEE II does a good job of ranking all risk factors, which facilitates risk comparison and identification of risks requiring special attention. Researchers apply fuzzy PROMETHEE to provide application novelty, for instance, Mokrini applied PROMETHEE combined with fuzzy theory to the risk assessment of pharmaceutical supply chain, providing a broader research idea [34]. Although showing many advantages and wider application, this method is qualitatively expressed and usually depends on opinions and experience of decision-maker and does not provide a method to determine the weight of evaluation criteria, hence, easily to be misunderstood by the vagueness of linguistic terms.…”
Section: Mcda Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the experts’ preferences are uncertain and imprecise, the traditional methods do not completely capture and solve these types of decision problems. Therefore, combined fuzzy-based MCDM methods have been developed to exploit the strength of each technique for outsourcing provider evaluation and selection such as fuzzy DEMATEL and FTOPSIS (Alkhatib et al , 2015), fuzzy AHP and fuzzy PROMETHEE (El Mokrini et al , 2016), BSC and fuzzy AHP (Modak et al , 2017), DEMATEL and fuzzy ANP (Uygun et al , 2015), and intuitionistic fuzzy AHP and SWOT (Tavana et al , 2016).…”
Section: Review Of Analytical Methods For Outsourcing Provider Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, pharmaceutical firms are forced to change their strategies now and then because of variations in the market economy. Predicting the correct volume is a major challenge because of relentless and fluctuating demand and more risk assessment measures are taken at critical points (El Mokrini et al , 2016). Old logistic methods are least supply chain responsive and get saturated and become incapable of meeting new challenges (El Mokrini et al , 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical and Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%