Evaluating One Health: the role of team science in multisectoral collaboration

Errecaborde, Kaylee; Rist, Cassidy; Travis, Dominic A.; Ragan, Valerie E.; Potter, Ted; Pekol, Amy; Pelican, Katharine M.; Dutcher, Tracey V.

doi:10.20506/rst.38.1.2960

Cited by 14 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Second, there was no consistent framework or language for reporting the successes or challenges of collaboration, and thus, important content may have been missed during the search and review [36]. The scoping review team tried to overcome this with two strategies, which included building an expanded list of search terms and conducting an iterative review process using two independent transdisciplinary reviewers.…”

Section: Scoping Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Language used to describe One Health work continues to be a challenge when working across disciplines. Each discipline contributing, and specifically those authors reporting on these interactions, bring their own nomenclature and vernacular [36]. As also discussed in the limitations of this work, we encountered challenges in how authors reported on which entities were involved in the response to a health event.…”

Section: Collaborative Success Factors Categorized As Starting Conditmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This creates a pivotal challenge in understanding how to improve One Health operations. It became clear in the literature review that there was no standard framework for how to evaluate One Health processes [12,36]. Although networks and collaborators such as the Network on the Evaluation of One Health are making important advances, practical evaluation tools are still needed [83].…”

Section: Collaborative Success Factors Categorized As Starting Conditmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Factors that enable effective One Health collaborations - A scoping review of the literature

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Advocates for a One Health approach recognize that global health challenges require multidisciplinary collaborative efforts. While past publications have looked at interdisciplinary competency training for collaboration, few have identified the factors and conditions that enable operational One Health. Through a scoping review of the literature, a multidisciplinary team of researchers analyzed peer-reviewed publications describing multisectoral collaborations around infectious disease-related health events. The review identified 12 factors that support successful One Health collaborations and a coordinated response to health events across three levels: two individual factors (education & training and prior experience & existing relationships), four organizational factors (organizational structures, culture, human resources and, communication), and six network factors (network structures, relationships, leadership, management, available & accessible resources, political environment). The researchers also identified the stage of collaboration during which these factors were most critical, further organizing into starting condition or process-based factors. The research found that publications on multisectoral collaboration for health events do not uniformly report on successes or challenges of collaboration and rarely identify outputs or outcomes of the collaborative process. This paper proposes a common language and framework to enable more uniform reporting, implementation, and evaluation of future One Health collaborations.

show abstract

Section: Scoping Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Collaborative Success Factors Categorized As Starting Conditmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Collaborative Success Factors Categorized As Starting Conditmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Factors that enable effective One Health collaborations - A scoping review of the literature

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One example is the interdisciplinary team and its network, which were considered as major (and yet under-evaluated) drivers of surveillance effectiveness by the team of CIPARS. Teamwork has been recognized as an important component of effective organizations in different settings, including in health systems (39), and has been recognized as an important component of successful OH initiatives (40,41). However, the evaluation of this element has been mostly absent in the evaluation tools for surveillance systems, currently available.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating the Integration of One Health in Surveillance Systems for Antimicrobial Use and Resistance: A Conceptual Framework

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is now widely acknowledged that surveillance of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) must adopt a “One Health” (OH) approach to successfully address the significant threats this global public health issue poses to humans, animals, and the environment. While many protocols exist for the evaluation of surveillance, the specific aspect of the integration of a OH approach into surveillance systems for AMR and antimicrobial Use (AMU), suffers from a lack of common and accepted guidelines and metrics for its monitoring and evaluation functions. This article presents a conceptual framework to evaluate the integration of OH in surveillance systems for AMR and AMU, named the Integrated Surveillance System Evaluation framework (ISSE framework). The ISSE framework aims to assist stakeholders and researchers who design an overall evaluation plan to select the relevant evaluation questions and tools. The framework was developed in partnership with the Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS). It consists of five evaluation components, which consider the capacity of the system to: [1] integrate a OH approach, [2] produce OH information and expertise, [3] generate actionable knowledge, [4] influence decision-making, and [5] positively impact outcomes. For each component, a set of evaluation questions is defined, and links to other available evaluation tools are shown. The ISSE framework helps evaluators to systematically assess the different OH aspects of a surveillance system, to gain comprehensive information on the performance and value of these integrated efforts, and to use the evaluation results to refine and improve the surveillance of AMR and AMU globally.

show abstract

“…The intent was to reflect the 'real-world' workplace, with teams composed of people with different experience levels and/or backgrounds, organized by a team leader, all working toward a common goal (Ernst & Yip 2009, Gratton et al, 2007. This approach required students to actively engage in the skills that formed the basis for project success -shared leadership, collaboration, setting clear expectations and goals, and multidisciplinarity (Bennet & Galdin, 2012, Errecaborde et al, 2019 -while also developing ESH skills directly related to project development -systems mapping, stakeholder assessment, and science communication, among others (Charron, 2012).…”

Section: Graduate Student Leadership Communication and Project Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecosystem Health Education: Teaching Leadership Through Team-Based Assignments

Sopdie

Wolf²,

Spicer

et al. 2021

JHETP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The health and sustainability of humans, animals, and environments are interdependent. The relationship between climate change, disease emergence, and food security on sustainability of ecosystem services is embodied in the sustainable development goals (SDGs). A diverse workforce needs to be equipped with leadership skills to function in a transdisciplinary, team-based environment. Ecosystem health (ESH) provides a critical and innovative approach to solving these complex challenges and offers a toolbox to actualize SDGs. This article outlines the development of a course detailing the process of framing a new academic approach in ESH as a training pathway for undergraduate and graduate students.

show abstract

Evaluating One Health: the role of team science in multisectoral collaboration

Cited by 14 publications

References 0 publications

Factors that enable effective One Health collaborations - A scoping review of the literature

Factors that enable effective One Health collaborations - A scoping review of the literature

Evaluating the Integration of One Health in Surveillance Systems for Antimicrobial Use and Resistance: A Conceptual Framework

Ecosystem Health Education: Teaching Leadership Through Team-Based Assignments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About