2012
DOI: 10.4139/sfj.63.739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating of Adhesive Strength on Resin-Metal Interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we separate these waveforms, we observe a hydroxy group (OH) or an ether bond (COC), and a carbonyl group (CO) and a carboxyl group (COOH), and we see that three times more COOH groups were detected in the water vapor plasma treatment than in the oxygen plasma treatment (see Table ). While the bonding strength and hydrophilicity are heavily influenced by the surface roughness, when measured using a stylus surface profiler (Dektak 3st, manufactured by VEECO), we found that, in terms of arithmetic mean roughness (Ra), the surface roughness of the COP was 13.1 nm after the oxygen plasma treatment and was 11.6 nm after the water vapor plasma treatment, and this is not a significant difference. This suggests that the difference in the generated amount of COOH groups observed by XPS is the major factor of the differences in the bonding and the hydrophilicity of the COP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…If we separate these waveforms, we observe a hydroxy group (OH) or an ether bond (COC), and a carbonyl group (CO) and a carboxyl group (COOH), and we see that three times more COOH groups were detected in the water vapor plasma treatment than in the oxygen plasma treatment (see Table ). While the bonding strength and hydrophilicity are heavily influenced by the surface roughness, when measured using a stylus surface profiler (Dektak 3st, manufactured by VEECO), we found that, in terms of arithmetic mean roughness (Ra), the surface roughness of the COP was 13.1 nm after the oxygen plasma treatment and was 11.6 nm after the water vapor plasma treatment, and this is not a significant difference. This suggests that the difference in the generated amount of COOH groups observed by XPS is the major factor of the differences in the bonding and the hydrophilicity of the COP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…If we separate these waveforms, we observe a hydroxy group (-OH) or an ether bond (-COC-), and a carbonyl group (-C=O) and a carboxyl group (-COOH), and we see that three times more -COOH groups were detected in the water vapor plasma treatment than in the oxygen plasma treatment (see Table 2). While the bonding strength and hydrophilicity are heavily influenced by the surface roughness, [30][31][32] when measured using a stylus surface profiler (Dektak 3st, manufactured by VEECO), we found that, in terms of arithmetic mean roughness (Ra), the surface roughness of the COP was 13.1 nm after the oxygen plasma treatment and was 11.6 nm after the water vapor plasma treatment, and this is not a significant difference. This suggests that the difference in the generated amount of -COOH groups observed by XPS is the major factor of the differences in the bonding and the hydrophilicity of the COP.…”
Section: Xpsmentioning
confidence: 99%