Evaluating Nonphysician Staff Members' Self-Perceived Ability to Provide Multisource Evaluations of Residents

Abstract

Background Multisource evaluations of residents offer valuable feedback, yet there is little evidence on the best way to collect these data from a range of health care professionals. Objective This study evaluated nonphysician staff members' ability to assess internal medicine residents' performance and behavior, and explored whether staff members differed in their perceived ability to participate in resident evaluations. Methods We distributed an anonymous survey to nurses, medical assistants, and administrative staff at 6 internal medicine residency continuity clinics. Differences between nurses and other staff members' perceived ability to evaluate resident behavior were examined using independent t tests. Results The survey response rate was 82% (61 of 74). A total of 55 respondents (90%) reported that it was important for them to evaluate residents. Participants reported being able to evaluate professional behaviors very well (62% [36 of 58] on the domain of respect to staff; 61% [36 of 59] on attire; and 54% [32 of 59] on communication). Individuals without a clinical background reported being uncomfortable evaluating medical knowledge (60%; 24 of 40) and judgment (55%; 22 of 40), whereas nurses reported being more comfortable evaluating these competencies. Respondents reported that the biggest barrier to evaluation was limited contact (86%; 48 of 56), and a significant amount of feedback was given verbally rather than on written evaluations. Conclusions Nonphysician staff members agree it is important to evaluate residents, and they are most comfortable providing feedback on professional behaviors. A significant amount of feedback is provided verbally but not necessarily captured in a formal written evaluation process.

General Surgery Resident Case Logs: Do They Accurately Reflect Resident Experience?

“…[14][15][16][17][18] Factors associated with gender, generation, learning style, and personality may influence the way residents recall their role in a case. [19][20][21][22][23][24] Minter et al 19 demonstrated that female general surgery residents tend to report experiences different from those of their male counterparts during training.…”

A qualitative exploration: questioning multisource feedback in residency education

“…Although evidence from both the feedback and MSF literature emphasizes the source of feedback as a major factor, there has been minimal direct investigation into the nature of the relationship between feedback provider and recipient and how it may affect MSF [ 16 , 17 ]. A recent study showed AHCPs are interested in providing residents with feedback on professionalism in the outpatient setting [ 18 ]. This study aimed to further the understanding of residents’ and AHCPs’ perceptions of MSF, to identify prerequisites to an effective MSF program in postgraduate medical education.…”

Do Programme Coordinators Contribute to the Professional Development of Residents? An Exploratory Study

“…6 The authors argued that this image came from societal expectations of women as caring beings responsible for the welfare and outcomes of the young. Nickels et al 7 reported that non-physician staff members, including 19 administrative staff, felt comfortable providing feedback on the professional behaviour of residents, suggesting an expansion of the coordinators' role. Our prior work demonstrated that coordinators in Japan recognized the importance of educational support roles, including the parental role, for trainees.…”