The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1002/cplx.21391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating nonlinear variability of mental fatigue behavioral indices during long‐term attentive task

Abstract: This study investigates the behavioral indices of attention. A simple repetitive attentive task that resulted in mental fatigue was used consecutively in four trials. In the first step, reaction time and error responses were recorded to evaluate differences among trials. During the task, subjects showed different responses to stimulations. In the second part, to recognize the strategies, multiple clustering methods such as k-means and fuzzy c-means were performed in which behavioral indices and nonlinear featu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such results parallel similar results in vigilance studies, where reaction times, false alarms, and stimuli missed increase over time, and such changes in performance are likely an indicator for mental fatigue, which could be influenced by boredom (Azarnoosh, Nasrabadi, Mohammadi, & Firoozabadi, 2012;Ballard, 1996;Scerbo, 1998b). However, one problem with the use of implicit measures is their infrequency.…”
Section: Implicit Task-related Measuressupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Such results parallel similar results in vigilance studies, where reaction times, false alarms, and stimuli missed increase over time, and such changes in performance are likely an indicator for mental fatigue, which could be influenced by boredom (Azarnoosh, Nasrabadi, Mohammadi, & Firoozabadi, 2012;Ballard, 1996;Scerbo, 1998b). However, one problem with the use of implicit measures is their infrequency.…”
Section: Implicit Task-related Measuressupporting
confidence: 80%
“…It must be emphasized that while the GIGa framework, theoretically motivated by the dynamics of complex networks, provides for a clear analytical description of distribution's properties as a function of its parameters, our tail fitting technique apropos power‐law tails and our conjecture of the relationship between the progressive task complexity and distribution's half‐width and modal PDF are not conceptually tied to the specifics of the GIGa and could be readily applied to analysis of alternative frameworks. Toward that end, we point out to a number of studies that attack similar problems with a variety of approaches .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trend is reasonable since it took initial 1–2 min for participants to learn the game and then they got drowsy or tired as the game continued for a longer period, based on the reviews noted earlier. This definition of attention has limited scope as it does not include RT, which is shown to be related to attention and fatigue in earlier work [ 53 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%