Evaluating Nanoparticle Breakthrough during Drinking Water Treatment

Abstract

Background: Use of engineered nanoparticles (NPs) in consumer products is resulting in NPs in drinking water sources. Subsequent NP breakthrough into treated drinking water is a potential exposure route and human health threat.Objectives: In this study we investigated the breakthrough of common NPs—silver (Ag), titanium dioxide (TiO2), and zinc oxide (ZnO)—into finished drinking water following conventional and advanced treatment.Methods: NPs were spiked into five experimental waters: groundwater, surface water, synthetic freshwater, synthetic freshwater containing natural organic matter, and tertiary wastewater effluent. Bench-scale coagulation/flocculation/sedimentation simulated conventional treatment, and microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) simulated advanced treatment. We monitored breakthrough of NPs into treated water by turbidity removal and inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).Results: Conventional treatment resulted in 2–20%, 3–8%, and 48–99% of Ag, TiO2, and ZnO NPs, respectively, or their dissolved ions remaining in finished water. Breakthrough following MF was 1–45% for Ag, 0–44% for TiO2, and 36–83% for ZnO. With UF, NP breakthrough was 0–2%, 0–4%, and 2–96% for Ag, TiO2, and ZnO, respectively. Variability was dependent on NP stability, with less breakthrough of aggregated NPs compared with stable NPs and dissolved NP ions.Conclusions: Although a majority of aggregated or stable NPs were removed by simulated conventional and advanced treatment, NP metals were detectable in finished water. As environmental NP concentrations increase, we need to consider NPs as emerging drinking water contaminants and determine appropriate drinking water treatment processes to fully remove NPs in order to reduce their potential harmful health outcomes.Citation: Abbott Chalew TE, Ajmani GS, Huang H, Schwab KJ. 2013. Evaluating nanoparticle breakthrough during drinking water treatment. Environ Health Perspect 121:1161–1166; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1306574

Release and toxicity comparison between industrial- and sunscreen-derived nano-ZnO particles

“…This finding is in good agreement with recent results on the evaluation of NPs during drinking water treatment where a 48-99 % range of ZnO still remains in the finished water after conventional treatment (Abbott Chalew et al 2013).…”

A comparative study of synthetic and natural coagulants for silver nanoparticles removal from wastewater

“…Both synthetic coagulants and natural coagulants were tested to see the silver removal from contaminated water [20]. The natural coagulants selected for this study were H. esculentus and O. basilicum.…”

Adsorption of MS2 on oxide nanoparticles affects chlorine disinfection and solar inactivation

“…Engineered nanoparticles (NPs) have many environmental applications ranging from antimicrobial or antiviral agents to groundwater remediation (Lara et al, 2010;You et al, 2011). However, owing to the ultra-small sizes, NPs may break through conventional water treatment processes and accumulate in natural water bodies (Chalew et al, 2013;Limbach et al, 2008). Assessment of the fate of NPs in the conventional water treatment processes and potential impacts on drinking water systems is still the major task for securing sustainability of nanotechnology.…”