Evaluating Multiple Narratives

doi:10.1007/978-0-387-71825-5

Cited by 55 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Further, a number of previous works in archaeology and heritage studies can be pointed to that are of kindred spirit to a rhetoric approach, such as attention to narrative (Habu, Fawcett, and Matsunaga 2008;Joyce 2002;Pluciennik 1999), language (Colwell-Chanthaphonh 2009), semiotics (Preucel and Bauer 2001;Bauer 2013), dialogue (Harrison 2013), and discourse (Smith 2006;Waterton, Smith, and Campbell 2006). Rhetoric depends on narrative forms, language, semiotics, dialogue, and discourses, but we suggest rhetoric is more.…”

Section: The Rhetorical Edge Of Cultural Heritagementioning

confidence: 72%

Rights: Heritage Rights and the Rhetoric of Reality in Pre-Revolution Tunisia

Samuels¹

2015

Heritage Keywords: Rhetoric and Redescription in Cultural Heritage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: The Rhetorical Edge Of Cultural Heritagementioning

confidence: 72%

Rights: Heritage Rights and the Rhetoric of Reality in Pre-Revolution Tunisia

Samuels¹

2015

Heritage Keywords: Rhetoric and Redescription in Cultural Heritage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: The Rhetorical Edge Of Cultural Heritagementioning

confidence: 72%

Memory: Towards the Reclamation of a Vital Concept

Moshenska¹

2015

Heritage Keywords: Rhetoric and Redescription in Cultural Heritage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Against the backdrop of increasing social change, an urgency courses through contemporary life for weaving the past into the present. The process of folding past conditions into present ones is selective; it has to be, given the richly textured inheritance bestowed on each passing generation (Trouillot 1995). The result over the past century plus has been a gradual refining of practices and ways of talking about what came before, encompassed by the concept of 'cultural heritage.' Cultural heritage is variously invoked as something (some object, site, building, landscape, traditional practice) with historic connections that must be properly tended to, as well as the field of expertise that has developed around this care. Over time, or at critical moments provoked by shifting events, these practices and languages of heritage became incorporated into political and legal institutions with jurisdiction over local, regional (e.g., state), national, or international bodies of governance. National standards have traditionally been the most influential in institutionalizing how heritage is dealt with, but increasingly so too are international norms codified within an expanding oeuvre of global conventions, recommendations, lists, safeguards, management guidelines, and reports picked up as 'best practices.

show abstract

“…A common, often implicit, convention is to use Gordon et al 2016;Joyce 2008;Schofield et al 2011). In some cases, definitions have limited archaeological practice to refer to field practices (e.g.…”

Section: Archaeological Perspectives On Practice and Knowledge Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Archaeological Practices, Knowledge Work and Digitalisation

Huvila

Huggett

2018

Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Defining what constitute archaeological practices is a prerequisite for understanding where and how archaeological and archaeologically relevant information and knowledge are made, what counts as archaeological information, and where the limits are situated. The aim of this position paper, developed as a part of the COST action Archaeological practices and knowledge work in the digital environment (www.arkwork.eu), is to highlight the need for at least a relative consensus on the extents of archaeological practices in order to be able to understand and develop archaeological practices and knowledge work in the contemporary digital context. The text discusses approaches to study archaeological practices and knowledge work including Nicolini's notions of zooming in and zooming out, and proposes that a distinction between archaeological and archaeology-related practices could provide a way to negotiate the 'archaeologicality' of diverse practices.

show abstract

Evaluating Multiple Narratives

Cited by 55 publications

References 47 publications

Rights: Heritage Rights and the Rhetoric of Reality in Pre-Revolution Tunisia

Rights: Heritage Rights and the Rhetoric of Reality in Pre-Revolution Tunisia

Memory: Towards the Reclamation of a Vital Concept

Archaeological Practices, Knowledge Work and Digitalisation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About