Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/tale.2013.6654501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating multiple choice items in determining quality of test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted with the proposed instrument, with the results corroborated by a RASCH model (RM) (Rasch, 1980) to ascertain the students' ability and, thus, support the findings obtained. Moreover, the RM provided validity and reliability evidence for the proposed instrument (Aziz et al, 2013;Raudzatul, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted with the proposed instrument, with the results corroborated by a RASCH model (RM) (Rasch, 1980) to ascertain the students' ability and, thus, support the findings obtained. Moreover, the RM provided validity and reliability evidence for the proposed instrument (Aziz et al, 2013;Raudzatul, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Rasch model is common in the literature (Hambleton et al , 1991; Baker, 2001; McAlpine, 2002a, b; Lee et al , 2011; Liu et al , 2011; Aziz et al , 2013). As stated by Hambleton et al (1991), even though its form is different from the one that is presented for the logistic model of one parameter, it is mathematically equivalent to this.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%