2022
DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed7080203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Molecular Xenomonitoring as a Tool for Lymphatic Filariasis Surveillance in Samoa, 2018–2019

Abstract: Molecular xenomonitoring (MX), the detection of filarial DNA in mosquitoes using molecular methods (PCR), is a potentially useful surveillance strategy for lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination programs. Delay in filarial antigen (Ag) clearance post-treatment is a limitation of using human surveys to provide an early indicator of the impact of mass drug administration (MDA), and MX may be more useful in this setting. We compared prevalence of infected mosquitoes pre- and post-MDA (2018 and 2019) in 35 primary … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two studies from American Samoa and Samoa, comprising 11 study sites, provided comparisons for a meta-analysis of molecular xenomonitoring prevalence between Aedes and Culex mosquitoes. 40 , 45 There was no difference between the two genera (prevalence ratio: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.52–2.19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Two studies from American Samoa and Samoa, comprising 11 study sites, provided comparisons for a meta-analysis of molecular xenomonitoring prevalence between Aedes and Culex mosquitoes. 40 , 45 There was no difference between the two genera (prevalence ratio: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.52–2.19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Detailed description of the sampling design has been previously reported [ 35 , 37 ]. In brief, participants were surveyed from 35 primary sampling units (PSUs) across Upolu, Savai’i, and Manono Islands.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring of MDA performance is mainly achieved through microscopic examination of microfilariae in night time blood and detection of circulating filarial antigens. Although microscopic examinations provides the most reliable estimates, night time sampling is a major challenge and also infections may be missed in presence of unmated adult worms (17) .While monitoring of CFA can provide information about prevalence of W. bancrofti infection and antibody testing can provide a sensitive indicator of exposure levels, antibody testing cannot distinguish previous from current infectious leading to an over estimation of the true burden of infection. Molecular xenomontoring (MX) that relies on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been suggested by WHO as an important non-invasive surveillance tool to complement human surveys (17,18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although microscopic examinations provides the most reliable estimates, night time sampling is a major challenge and also infections may be missed in presence of unmated adult worms (17) .While monitoring of CFA can provide information about prevalence of W. bancrofti infection and antibody testing can provide a sensitive indicator of exposure levels, antibody testing cannot distinguish previous from current infectious leading to an over estimation of the true burden of infection. Molecular xenomontoring (MX) that relies on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been suggested by WHO as an important non-invasive surveillance tool to complement human surveys (17,18). MX provides a platform for monitoring infection in known vectors and also provides an opportunity to incriminate new vectors involved in the transmission of W. bancrofti (19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%