The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2009.12.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating microfossil content of dental calculus from Brazilian sambaquis

Abstract: Gregório, "Evaluating microfossil content of dental calculus from Brazilian sambaquis" (2010). Karl Reinhard Papers/Publications. 53.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
2
23

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
64
2
23
Order By: Relevance
“…They can be recovered from a variety of archaeological contexts, and have been used to explore plant use in a variety of time periods across human history (Henry and Piperno, 2008;Henry et al, 2011;Pearsall et al, 2004;Zarrillo and Kooyman, 2006;Piperno and Dillehay, 2008;Yang et al, 2009;Revedin et al, 2010;Wesolowski et al, 2010 Starch grains and phytoliths were collected from dental calculus and stone tool residues using methods slightly modified from those described previously (SOM Text; Henry and Piperno, 2008;Henry et al, 2011). Every microremain was photographed, described using the terminology of the International Code for Starch Nomenclature (ICSN, 2011), and the International Code for Phytolith Nomenclature (Madella et al, 2005), and assigned to a 'type'.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be recovered from a variety of archaeological contexts, and have been used to explore plant use in a variety of time periods across human history (Henry and Piperno, 2008;Henry et al, 2011;Pearsall et al, 2004;Zarrillo and Kooyman, 2006;Piperno and Dillehay, 2008;Yang et al, 2009;Revedin et al, 2010;Wesolowski et al, 2010 Starch grains and phytoliths were collected from dental calculus and stone tool residues using methods slightly modified from those described previously (SOM Text; Henry and Piperno, 2008;Henry et al, 2011). Every microremain was photographed, described using the terminology of the International Code for Starch Nomenclature (ICSN, 2011), and the International Code for Phytolith Nomenclature (Madella et al, 2005), and assigned to a 'type'.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 shows the archaeological time periods referred to in this article. provided evidence of plant use in archaeological contexts, for example: agricultural beginnings and plant domestication [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]; hominin and pre-agricultural human diet and ancient technologies [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]; prehistoric chimpanzee food processing and diet [54]; environmental reconstruction [55]. Table 1 shows the archaeological time periods referred to in this article.…”
Section: Starch As An Archaeological Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starch has been found in samples of dental calculus ranging from Lower Palaeolithic hominins to Victorians [41][42][43][44][45][46][47], including from sources as diverse as Norse Shetland (Scotland), pre-Mesolithic Sudan [44], from chimpanzees [56] early Balkan agricultural populations [81] and from tropical environments [53,82]. Recovery of data on the use of plants, particularly for the early stages of the Palaeolithic, is very limited [83].…”
Section: Dental Calculusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have highlighted the risks of laboratory contamination from modern plant microremains (Crowther et al, 2014;Wesolowski et al, 2010). To address the possibility of contamination we conducted a regime of weekly laboratory cleaning at the MPI-EVA to remove contamination.…”
Section: Optical Microscopy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%