Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.1097/jpa.0000000000000211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Medical Spanish Proficiency: A Comparison of Physician Assistant Student Self-Assessment to Standardized Patient and Expert Faculty Member Ratings

Abstract: PA students participating in a medical Spanish curriculum and SPs show good correlation with an expert faculty rater in assessing Spanish proficiency during an OSCE. Standardized patients demonstrate scoring leniency. The ILR has potential for tracking aggregate student progress and curriculum effectiveness. With training, student self-rating could be used for interval assessment of medical Spanish communication.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 However, little research exists regarding the use of SA educational practices in PA education 21 or the accuracy of PA students' SAs. [22][23][24] The few PA studies available are consistent with current SA literature regarding competence miscalibration. 22,23 In contrast to the competency expectations defined for PAs, the Accreditation Review Commission for Physician Assistant Education (ARC-PA) does not include SA instruction in the accreditation standards.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…20 However, little research exists regarding the use of SA educational practices in PA education 21 or the accuracy of PA students' SAs. [22][23][24] The few PA studies available are consistent with current SA literature regarding competence miscalibration. 22,23 In contrast to the competency expectations defined for PAs, the Accreditation Review Commission for Physician Assistant Education (ARC-PA) does not include SA instruction in the accreditation standards.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…[22][23][24] The few PA studies available are consistent with current SA literature regarding competence miscalibration. 22,23 In contrast to the competency expectations defined for PAs, the Accreditation Review Commission for Physician Assistant Education (ARC-PA) does not include SA instruction in the accreditation standards. 25 Despite the expectation defined in the new PA graduate competency framework 19 for PA graduates to exhibit SA competence, PA programs may not include SA instructional practices given the volume of curricular content otherwise required.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of the six publications describing outcomes of medical Spanish courses in medical school or similar settings since 2012, four describe learner assessment via SP objective structured clinical examinations, 43–46 two of which are medical Spanish courses in medical school programs 43,44 and two in other health professions graduate programs (pharmacy and physician assistant programs). 45,46 Two other studies describe use of an oral proficiency interview as a learner assessment tool. 47,48 A seventh publication that describes medical Spanish curricula and assessment at three medical schools reports use of SP examinations in all three programs and an oral proficiency interview in one of the programs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%