2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating mediation and moderation effects in school psychology: A presentation of methods and review of current practice

Abstract: Third variable effects elucidate the relation between two other variables, and can describe why they are related or under what conditions they are related. This article demonstrates methods to analyze two third-variable effects: moderation and mediation. The utility of examining moderation and mediation effects in school psychology is described and current use of the analyses in applied school psychology research is reviewed and evaluated. Proper statistical methods to test the effects are presented, and diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
124
0
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
124
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…family and non-family firms), and Panel 2 for family firms only as a further test. According to Fairchild andMcQuillin (2010), Braumoeller (2004), and Jaccard and Turrisi (2003), any conclusions regarding the direct effect of any constitutive terms are meaningless and illegitimate. Hence, every firm's performance indicator was examined in two models (columns): the first column is created to test the direct relationship hypotheses (H1, H2a, and H3a) while the purpose of the second one is to test the interactive (moderating) effect of the two variables: family CEO and Founder CEO (H2b and H3b).…”
Section: Multivariate Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…family and non-family firms), and Panel 2 for family firms only as a further test. According to Fairchild andMcQuillin (2010), Braumoeller (2004), and Jaccard and Turrisi (2003), any conclusions regarding the direct effect of any constitutive terms are meaningless and illegitimate. Hence, every firm's performance indicator was examined in two models (columns): the first column is created to test the direct relationship hypotheses (H1, H2a, and H3a) while the purpose of the second one is to test the interactive (moderating) effect of the two variables: family CEO and Founder CEO (H2b and H3b).…”
Section: Multivariate Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full mediation is supported if the predictor variable is no longer significant when mediator is included in the model. In short, after reaching step 4 (Table 1), if c≈c', then there is no mediation; if c>c', there is partial mediation; and if c' is not significant, then there is full mediation (Fairchild & McQuillin, 2010).…”
Section: Testing For the Mediationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article will go beyond the perspective of statistical moderation and analyze explanatory approaches in sport science to see which person characteristics and environmental features are included in which way in their theoretical assumptions. It will draw on current mediatormoderator frameworks (e.g., [15]) to consider statements on the interplay between exercise, SWB, person characteristics, and environmental features. The analysis will concentrate on examining the theoretical moderation and mediation of the exercise-SWB relation in terms of its content.…”
Section: How Does Exercise Influence Swb?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moderator effects, in contrast, indicate that other intervening variables are influencing the strength or the direction of the relation between exercise and SWB. In recent years, various authors have pointed out that a detailed examination of moderators and mediators shows promising potential for systematizing knowledge and thereby bringing about theoretical progress (e.g., [15,16]). Based on this sketch of the problem, this article focuses on two central questions: (1) What is meant by SWB in sport science research?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%