2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating maximum stand density and size–density relationships based on the Competition Density Rule in Korean pines and Japanese larch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The plots were installed in the forest where the most recent thinning was conducted at least more than 7 years ago. The selected target stands had a relatively high stand density before installing the plots and executing the thinning operation [24,25]. The relative density (stand density index divided by maximum stand density index) before thinning was mostly above 0.7 in each stand type by species, according to the models of Lee and Choi [24,25].…”
Section: Plot Characteristic With Stand Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The plots were installed in the forest where the most recent thinning was conducted at least more than 7 years ago. The selected target stands had a relatively high stand density before installing the plots and executing the thinning operation [24,25]. The relative density (stand density index divided by maximum stand density index) before thinning was mostly above 0.7 in each stand type by species, according to the models of Lee and Choi [24,25].…”
Section: Plot Characteristic With Stand Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trees sampled in the present study were dominant or codominant in the plots where the relative density was higher than 0.7. These plots represent dense stands, where the growth of biometric features, for example, diameter vs. height, may differ from that in low-density stands [24,25]. Nevertheless, the study plots cannot be considered as unthinned stands because the history of silvicultural treatments and stand density during the entire period of tree growth is unknown.…”
Section: Model Evaluation and Applicabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, although there is no doubt of the relationship between increasing mean D and a decreasing number of trees per unit area, most of the existing reports indicate that the slope parameter of the maximum size-density equation and self-thinning rule is not a universal constant [5,36,59]. Accounting for other factors, such as H, crown size, tree species, and site conditions, can improve the relationships between maximum size-density and self-thinning [48,53,60].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the relationships were determined, Zeide and Burkhart suggested that tree D contributed the most, followed by volume and H [6,51]. However, there are no reports that systematically clarify the significance of all the relevant factors, and it is also not certain whether the obtained relationships are truly universal [6,10,59,61]. A critical challenge to clarify the relationships is the lack of a reliable and operative measure that can be used to identify fully stocked stands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerns have been expressed regarding the effects of stand density on tree growth and wood quality during stand development (Moore et al, 2012;Dobner et al, 2018). On the one hand, the contradictory findings from numerous studies based on commercial tree species indicate the impacts of stand density on ring width, wood density, and stem form (Tong and Zhang, 2005;Lee and Choi, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%