Evaluating Management Practices in Precision Agriculture for Maize Yield with Spatial Econometrics

Abstract

Precision agriculture (PA) aims to provide data on soil, nutrient use, irrigation, and crops, to guide management strategic decisions towards an efficient use of inputs, increasing production and avoiding environmental problems due to excessive accumulation of fertilizers. In this paper, PA data from a large Portuguese farm producing maize were used to assess the effectiveness of agronomic management decisions concerning fertilizer and nutrient use, seed choice, and water content, in terms of crop productivity. The maize yield in 2017 and 2018 was modelled as a function of manageable inputs and unmanageable factors introduced as control variables. Panel spatial econometric methods were used for specification and estimation, to control for spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity. The model proved to fit the data remarkably well and could be a good reference for specifying models to explain maize production; thus, helping researchers who need to deal with the huge amount of data that normally originates from PA. Additionally, it can be considered another tool for farm managers, helping in the design and evaluation of their agronomic management decisions.

Harnessing Genetic Diversity for Sustainable Maize Production: A Contemporary Perspective

“…UAVs equipped with cameras and sensors offer an agile and cost-effective way to monitor maize crops (Santos et al, 2022). They can capture high-resolution images and data, allowing farmers to detect issues such as nutrient deficiencies, disease outbreaks, and irrigation needs.…”

The Comparison Analysis of Uniform-and Variable-Rate Fertilizations on Winter Wheat Yield Parameters Using Site-Specific Seeding

“…Technological innovation plays an important role in making agriculture more efficient and sustainable. Among the main objectives of precision farming is to optimize yield and quality, minimizing environmental impact by improving resource efficiency [5,25]. During the experimental studies, the field was divided into five control zones after the soil ECa measurements, when the ECa varied from 22.6 (FZ-5) to 28.8 mS m −1 (FZ-1).…”