Evaluating macroscopic sex estimation methods using genetically sexed archaeological material: The medieval skeletal collection from St John's Divinity School, Cambridge

Abstract

Objectives In tests on known individuals macroscopic sex estimation has between 70% and 98% accuracy. However, materials used to create and test these methods are overwhelming modern. As sexual dimorphism is dependent on multiple factors, it is unclear whether macroscopic methods have similar success on earlier materials, which differ in lifestyle and nutrition. This research aims to assess the accuracy of commonly used traits by comparing macroscopic sex estimates to genetic sex in medieval English material. Materials and Methods Sixty‐six individuals from the 13th to 16th century Hospital of St John the Evangelist, Cambridge, were assessed. Genetic sex was determined using a shotgun approach. Eighteen skeletal traits were examined, and macroscopic sex estimates were derived from the os coxae, skull, and os coxae and skull combined. Each trait was tested for accuracy to explore sex estimates errors. Results The combined estimate (97.7%) outperformed the os coxae only estimate (95.7%), which outperformed the skull only estimate (90.4%). Accuracy rates for individual traits varied: Phenice traits were most accurate, whereas supraorbital margins, frontal bossing, and gonial flaring were least accurate. The preauricular sulcus and arc compose showed a bias in accuracy between sexes. Discussion Macroscopic sex estimates are accurate when applied to medieval material from Cambridge. However, low trait accuracy rates may relate to differences in dimorphism between the method derivative sample and the St John's collection. Given the sex bias, the preauricular sulcus, frontal bossing, and arc compose should be reconsidered as appropriate traits for sex estimation for this group.

Medieval injuries: Skeletal trauma as an indicator of past living conditions and hazard risk in Cambridge, England

“…The age of non‐adult individuals was determined using calcification of the permanent mandibular dentition (Moorrees et al, 1963 ). The biological sex of each individual over 15 years of age was estimated by examining the sexually dimorphic characteristics of the pelvis and skull (Buikstra & Ubelaker, 1994 ; Phenice, 1969 ; Schwartz, 2007 ) and, when available, through aDNA analyses (Inskip et al, 2019 ). Skeletons were divided into the following age categories: adolescent (12–17), young adult (18–25), middle adult (26–44), mature adult (45–60), and old adult (60+).…”

The prevalence of cancer in Britain before industrialization

“…The biological sex of each adult skeleton was estimated by examining the sexually dimorphic characteristics of the pelvis and cranium and through ancient DNA analysis when available (53 individuals). 22,23 Age at death was estimated by examining the pubic symphysis, auricular surface of the pelvis, and sternal ends of the ribs following standard guidelines. 24 The bones of each individual were cleaned of soil and visually inspected for lesions compatible with primary or metastatic tumors, be they osteolytic, blastic, or mixed.…”

“…In total, 96 males, 46 females, and 1 of indeterminate sex met the criteria for inclusion in the study (see Supporting Appendix). The biological sex of each adult skeleton was estimated by examining the sexually dimorphic characteristics of the pelvis and cranium and through ancient DNA analysis when available (53 individuals) 22,23 . Age at death was estimated by examining the pubic symphysis, auricular surface of the pelvis, and sternal ends of the ribs following standard guidelines 24…”

Osteobiography: The History of the Body as Real Bottom-Line History

“…F958 was male, according to both skeletal criteria (pelvic and cranial indications) and aDNA evidence. Based upon both pelvic traits (following standard protocols in Buikstra and Ubelaker [1994], as validated in Inskip et al [2018], these included the public symphysis [Brooks and Suchey 1990] and auricular surface [Buckberry and Chamberlain 2002]) and advanced dental wear (Brothwell 1981), he died between 40 and 60 years of age.…”