Evaluating Low-Speed Rear-End Impact Severity and Resultant Occupant Stress Parameters

Abstract

Automotive Systems Analysis, Inc. (ASA) and Lowell Hicks, Inc. (LHI) have developed a ground-up set of sensor instrumentation and recording method to document vehicle-artifact/occupant-stress parameters occurring from a continuing series of low-speed rear-end multi-vehicle impact tests (≈ 2 to 8 MPH). This work has four goal areas: 1) calculate impacted vehicle (TARGET) barrier equivalent velocity (BEV) from isolator Artifacts; 2) correlate calculated BEV' to occupant stress; 3) calibrate injury potential of occupant stress impulse; 4) compare occupant stress with everyday volunteer activities. The test collision series now includes several different vehicle pairs with varying impact/escape speeds, weight ratios, and parallel parameters from a driver side manikin and passenger side volunteer. Observable physical vehicle isolator artifacts (piston stroke scrapes) were compared with computer-recorded linear sensor time traces, and these data were fitted to a ‘calculated BEV’ worksheet/algorithm. The worksheet/algorithm method shown here was found to be reasonably repeatable, per vehicle model and series tested. Next, manikin and vounteer occupant stress data, measured along with TARGET vehicle BEVs, were charted and compared with injury-threshold-impulse criteria referenced in the literature. Lastly, the occupant-stress impulses were compared with sample stress impulses for various volunteer physical activities, as a practical calibration of vehicle occupant stress.

Study of the Emergency Braking Test with an Autonomous Bus and the sEMG Neck Response by Means of a Low-Cost System

“…Step 4 (Braking test performance): The deceleration test started when the volunteers were ready, they had no more questions, they had understood the experiment and when they were sensorised. The braking tests were designed following numerous references [ 3 , 53 , 63 , 67 , 74 , 75 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 ] and keeping in mind that subjects would not use the seat belt. The timing experiment was previously defined.…”

Forensic Epidemiology: A systematic approach to probabilistic determinations in disputed matters

“…This fallacy stems from the use of unvalidated constructs or inappropriate proxies for causal mechanisms. A good example is seen in the literature regarding whiplash injury; some authors have compared peak accelerations recorded at the head during activities such as sneezing 30 or skipping rope 31 to the accelerations observed in volunteer crash testing. The fallacy occurs when peak head acceleration is used as a proxy for injury risk, so that the improper conclusion is drawn that skipping rope and crashrelated trauma have the same injury potential.…”

Cervical Whiplash Injuries

“…V (acceleration), Newton's third Jaw of physics and, for instance, the statement has been made that the jolt syndrome proves that the force acting on a neck, in a whiplash si tuation, when the vehicles were not really damaged with a e V of under 5, is no greater than the forces acting on a neck when a person flops into hi s armchair. 11 From this has arisen the assumption that:…”