2015
DOI: 10.1117/12.2083444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating lossiness and fidelity in information visualization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When it comes to the usage of typography in visualization, two notable user studies [SOK*16,ACS*17] evaluate common guidelines. In addition, Brath and Banissi [BB15] presented an information‐theoretic approach quantifying the lossiness in visualizations based on evaluating the fidelity (number of unique levels perceivable for a particular visual attribute) in an encoding. Their approach measures the effectiveness of a particular set of visual encodings, which allows an efficient pruning of the design space of typographic dimensions.…”
Section: Text Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it comes to the usage of typography in visualization, two notable user studies [SOK*16,ACS*17] evaluate common guidelines. In addition, Brath and Banissi [BB15] presented an information‐theoretic approach quantifying the lossiness in visualizations based on evaluating the fidelity (number of unique levels perceivable for a particular visual attribute) in an encoding. Their approach measures the effectiveness of a particular set of visual encodings, which allows an efficient pruning of the design space of typographic dimensions.…”
Section: Text Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in addition to the example shown, a sparse example started with a treemap where the area was large and almost all the initial headlines were readable; and a dense example started with a treemap where the area was small and most of the initial headlines were too small to read). Information density for the proportional encoding consistently outperformed the treemap by a factor of 2 while the font weight encoding could underperform as shown in Table 2 (see [11] for details).…”
Section: Query Results Lists and Proportional Encodingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Measurement of lossiness and fidelity is a general approach to measuring and comparing information content across alternative visualization techniques [11] as shown in Tables 2, 3 and 4. While these calculations have not been shown for the other visualizations herein, in general, the use of font attributes increases information density compared to plain text.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information lossiness is an evaluation of the fidelity per visual attribute in an encoding; and an estimate of permutations across multiple attributes to compare relative lossiness (Brath and Banissi 2015). A simple example is shown in Figure 14: both maps use 5 levels of hue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%