2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-13674-5_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating (Linked) Metadata Transformations Across Cultural Heritage Domains

Abstract: Abstract. This paper describes an approach to the evaluation of different aspects in the transformation of existing metadata into Linked data-compliant knowledge bases. At Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Science, in the TORCH project, we are working on three different experimental case studies on extraction and mapping of broadcasting data and the interlinking of these with transformed library data. The case studies are investigating problems of heterogeneity and ambiguity in and between the do… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was taken as a separate theme as it was mentioned explicitly by these studies, and primarily reveals an awareness of and alignment with the discourse that surrounds linked data. This aspect was mentioned by Valentino [17], Niang et al [43], Tallerås et al [44], Winer [28], de Boer et al [45], and Binding and Tudhope [46].…”
Section: 35mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This was taken as a separate theme as it was mentioned explicitly by these studies, and primarily reveals an awareness of and alignment with the discourse that surrounds linked data. This aspect was mentioned by Valentino [17], Niang et al [43], Tallerås et al [44], Winer [28], de Boer et al [45], and Binding and Tudhope [46].…”
Section: 35mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In this paper, the subcategory fictional character is separated from person when the author found it relevant to show the difference. The TORCH project and annotating tools is discussed in detail in (Hoff & Preminger, 2015;Tallerås et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research is a part of the TORCH project (Transforming the Organization and Retrieval of Cultural Heritage) (Tallerås, Massey, Husevåg, Preminger, & Pharo, 2014). The objective of this project is research and development on issues related to automatic construction and structuring of metadata to improve access to digitized cultural expressions.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in [1], we have developed our own annotation tool, which we, in the long run, would like to adapt to a wider context and make hospitable to crowd sourcing. Successful crowdsourcing demands that the tool has as few usability issues as possible, which is the main objective of this endeavour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our annotation tool (first described in [1]) is developed in order to provide ground truth-data for the TORCH project 1 . In order to allow the collection of enough data, we believe that crowd-sourcing with the emphasis of non-experts, is mandatory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%