2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating landscape connectivity in fragmented habitats: Cantabrian capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus cantabricus) in northern Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Landscape connectivity is defined as the continuity of corridors, networks, or spatial matrices that quantitatively characterize the relationships between ecosystems [51]. Morphological spatial pattern analysis was adopted to identify and extract the core area, and the probability of connectivity (PC) index (Equation (3)) was selected to evaluate the landscape connectivity of the core area [52]. Repeated experiments show that 500 m is a more suitable fixed distance for connectivity analysis using the PC index.…”
Section: Identification Of Ecological Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landscape connectivity is defined as the continuity of corridors, networks, or spatial matrices that quantitatively characterize the relationships between ecosystems [51]. Morphological spatial pattern analysis was adopted to identify and extract the core area, and the probability of connectivity (PC) index (Equation (3)) was selected to evaluate the landscape connectivity of the core area [52]. Repeated experiments show that 500 m is a more suitable fixed distance for connectivity analysis using the PC index.…”
Section: Identification Of Ecological Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This index is calculated from the results obtained in the MSPA analysis, which is performed for a 1 pixel dispersion band. Taking into account the classifications of the 7 components of the MSPA, only the nodes and bridges are considered in the PC analysis, since only these can contribute to the improvement of connectivity (Saura et al, 2011;Velázquez et al, 2017).When analyzing the importance of the nodes and bridges, the PC-infinite data for each component was obtained, so that the importance of connectivity of the selected buildings for the location of the green roofs could be analyzed. Finally, we proceeded to reclassify PC data based on the maximum value obtained, on a scale of 1 to 100, to facilitate the comparison of the data.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combining the analyses of MSPA (focusing on structural analysis) and dPC (taking account of structural connectivity) in this study, we identified 10 cores with higher connectivity value as hubs [39]. The 10 core patches were identified by quantitatively examining their role in maintaining landscape connectivity rather than by simply selecting the ten largest patches in the landscape.…”
Section: Identifying the Current Status Of Ugimentioning
confidence: 99%