2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.10.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating land surface albedo estimation from Landsat MSS, TM, ETM +, and OLI data based on the unified direct estimation approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…physical and environmental factors. The factors that contribute to UHI effects have been reported in several previous studies 19,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] . These factors can be grouped into two categories, physical and environmental.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…physical and environmental factors. The factors that contribute to UHI effects have been reported in several previous studies 19,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] . These factors can be grouped into two categories, physical and environmental.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…where α λ is the surface albedo for the spectral range of λ, ρ TOA i is the TOA reflectance for band i, and c i and c 0 are the regression coefficients [58,66]. The values of c i and c 0 are given in Table 2.…”
Section: Total Shortwave Broadband Albedomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In actuality, land surface homogeneity varies with time. We analyzed the land surface homogeniety of the research area with a Landsat 8 OLI data-derived albedo [42], according to the literature [3,43], during dormant and growing seasons. The fitted sill values were both less than 0.001 [44], which indicates that the land surface is indeed homogeneous enough for direct comparison.…”
Section: Land Surface Homogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%