2003
DOI: 10.1067/mjd.2003.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating invasive cutaneous melanoma: Is the initial biopsy representative of the final depth?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One study reported that shave and punch biopsies performed by experienced dermatologists underestimated the true lesion depth by approximately 8% and 20%, respectively, while complete excision determined the final melanoma depth in all cases. 5 Accordingly, the current American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) guidelines for the diagnosis of melanoma state as follows:…”
Section: Decreasing the Rate Of Misdiagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study reported that shave and punch biopsies performed by experienced dermatologists underestimated the true lesion depth by approximately 8% and 20%, respectively, while complete excision determined the final melanoma depth in all cases. 5 Accordingly, the current American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) guidelines for the diagnosis of melanoma state as follows:…”
Section: Decreasing the Rate Of Misdiagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a decision not to do a complete excision is made, partial biopsy specimens are usually taken from the most deeply pigmented, elevated, nodular, or other clinically suspect area. However, as a result of sampling error or a lack of correlation between the clinical and histological features, the portion biopsied may not be the most histologically representative portion of the lesion (Ng, Barzilai et al 2003). Ng et al (Ng, Barzilai et al 2003) found that in 95 of 108 initial shave or punch biopsies (88%), the physicians' clinical assessment of the melanoma for biopsy was accurate.…”
Section: Interest Of Non-invasive Determination Of Breslow Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as a result of sampling error or a lack of correlation between the clinical and histological features, the portion biopsied may not be the most histologically representative portion of the lesion (Ng, Barzilai et al 2003). Ng et al (Ng, Barzilai et al 2003) found that in 95 of 108 initial shave or punch biopsies (88%), the physicians' clinical assessment of the melanoma for biopsy was accurate. A majority (84.8%) of the latter physicians were dermatologists with a median time of 11 years of post residency clinical experience.…”
Section: Interest Of Non-invasive Determination Of Breslow Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The same group had earlier demonstrated that in the hands of experienced dermatologists, accuracy of tumor depth by partial biopsy was achieved in only 88% of samples, which is unacceptable for appropriate patient management. 4 In addition, in the current health care environment, many patients with dermatologic disease will be seen by physicians instead of by dermatologists, and the use of physician assistants is increasing: all of these contribute to a current trend, recognized several years ago, of inadequate technique and biopsy size estimations. 5 In sum, the surgeon is often faced with a treatment dilemma in the case of a partially biopsied melanoma -whether to plan a "definitive" surgery based upon a provisional measurement in the anticipation that the Breslow's depth measurement represents the thickest portion of the tumor, or perform an excisional biopsy of the entire remaining lesion to get an accurate measurement prior to definitive surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%