2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating high-fidelity human simulators and standardized patients in an undergraduate nursing health assessment course

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
43
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulation has become an important element in nursing education, specifically in teaching the necessary skills and knowledge to prepare competent nurses (Ahmad & Safadi, 2009;Luctkar-Flude, Wilson-Keates, & Larocque, 2012). Instructors can control the manikin's responses and the HFS can respond to interventions provided by the student (Lasater, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation has become an important element in nursing education, specifically in teaching the necessary skills and knowledge to prepare competent nurses (Ahmad & Safadi, 2009;Luctkar-Flude, Wilson-Keates, & Larocque, 2012). Instructors can control the manikin's responses and the HFS can respond to interventions provided by the student (Lasater, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study that evaluated the use of SPs versus manikins to teach cardiac and pulmonary examinations to pharmacy students revealed that SPs were significantly more favored by students as a learning method (Grice, Wenger, Brooks, & Berry, 2012). Similarly, Luctkar-Flude, Wilson-Keates, and Larocque (2012) found that undergraduate nursing students were significantly less satisfied learning respiratory assessment skills on highfidelity human simulators (HFS) compared with SPs and community volunteers (CVs). The study also revealed that students in the HFS group reported feeling significantly less prepared for clinical than the students in the SP and CV groups (Luctkar-Flude et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Studies have shown that SPs are an effective pedagogy in medical education to improve communication skills, teach psychomotor skills, and enhance clinical knowledge (May, Park, & Lee, 2009). Similarly, SPs have been shown to be effective in nursing education in developing psychomotor skills such as blood pressure measurements (Sarmasoglu, Dinc, & Elcin, 2016), teaching interpersonal communication skills to nurse practitioner students (Lin, Chen, Chao, & Chen, 2013), and improving therapeutic communication in undergraduate psychiatric nursing education (Webster, 2014). A recent meta-analysis conducted by Oh, Deok-Jeon, and Koh (2015) demonstrated that simulation using SPs in nursing education had a significant effect on cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9,14,15] Lack of clinical sites, a shortage of patient opportunities for student learning, and the need for students to prepare for the transition into professional practice have created the demand for faculty to develop more realistic simulations. [12] Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) presents with a range of conditions characterized by challenges in social skills, repetitive behaviors, and verbal and non-verbal communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%