2011
DOI: 10.1080/15377903.2011.565281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Gifted Identification Practice: Aptitude Testing and Linguistically Diverse Learners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One reason is school systems' reliance on standardized intelligence tests for admission that privilege certain experiential/cultural/language backgrounds over others (Ford 2004;Myers et al 2004). Many standardized tests used for gifted identification are inappropriate or suboptimal for use with children from culturally diverse groups, due to cultural/language bias, differential predictive validity for Black students, and stereotype threat and anxiety that are invoked from the tests among Black students (Ford and Whiting 2010;Matthews and Kirsch 2011). Moreover, school teachers often serve as gate-keepers to gifted programs given reliance on teacher recommendations (Ford et al 2008;McBee 2010).…”
Section: Black Males In Gifted Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason is school systems' reliance on standardized intelligence tests for admission that privilege certain experiential/cultural/language backgrounds over others (Ford 2004;Myers et al 2004). Many standardized tests used for gifted identification are inappropriate or suboptimal for use with children from culturally diverse groups, due to cultural/language bias, differential predictive validity for Black students, and stereotype threat and anxiety that are invoked from the tests among Black students (Ford and Whiting 2010;Matthews and Kirsch 2011). Moreover, school teachers often serve as gate-keepers to gifted programs given reliance on teacher recommendations (Ford et al 2008;McBee 2010).…”
Section: Black Males In Gifted Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified eight empirical papers on nonverbal assessments (Giessman et al, 2013; V. Gonzalez, 2006;V. Gonzalez et al, 1996;Lakin & Lohman, 2011;Lohman et al, 2008;Lohman & Gambrell, 2012;M. S. Matthews & Kirsch, 2011;Mills & Tissot, 1995).…”
Section: • • the Need To Acknowledge That Standardized Testing Is Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research shows that CLD students are often denied access to challenging curricula and are underrepresented in gifted programs by greater than 40% nationwide (Ford et al, 2008). Other researchers have shown that percentage to be as high as 70 nationwide (Harris, Plucker, Rapp, & Martinez, 2009;Harris et al, 2007;Matthews & Kirsch, 2011). In traditional schooling, enrichment activities are exclusive, mandated only for those elite students who demonstrate traditional gifted characteristics and qualify for gifted services based on mandated assessment results.…”
Section: Description Of Enrichment Clusters In Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%