2015
DOI: 10.1037/a0038208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating gender similarities and differences using metasynthesis.

Abstract: Despite the common lay assumption that males and females are profoundly different, Hyde (2005) used data from 46 meta-analyses to demonstrate that males and females are highly similar. Nonetheless, the gender similarities hypothesis has remained controversial. Since Hyde's provocative report, there has been an explosion of meta-analytic interest in psychological gender differences. We utilized this enormous collection of 106 meta-analyses and 386 individual meta-analytic effects to reevaluate the gender simila… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
261
0
11

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(307 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
16
261
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Controlling for sex differences or ignoring potential sex differences in FEP tasks, as well as other tasks that may be related to functioning and symptoms in schizophrenia, is limiting our ability to uncover potentially important differences between men and women with schizophrenia, such as why women with schizophrenia overall show better functioning and less severe negative symptoms when compared to men. Finally, while the magnitude of sex differences in FEP may be small, a recent meta-synthesis of 106 meta-analyses of sex differences in nonclinical populations found that the effect sizes for all sorts of sex differences are typically relatively small, suggesting that men and women are more similar than dissimilar on a variety of psychological outcomes [88] . However, the authors cautioned that although such differences "are typically small, they should not be regarded as trivial, as even small effects can have important everyday consequences" (p. 17) [88] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Controlling for sex differences or ignoring potential sex differences in FEP tasks, as well as other tasks that may be related to functioning and symptoms in schizophrenia, is limiting our ability to uncover potentially important differences between men and women with schizophrenia, such as why women with schizophrenia overall show better functioning and less severe negative symptoms when compared to men. Finally, while the magnitude of sex differences in FEP may be small, a recent meta-synthesis of 106 meta-analyses of sex differences in nonclinical populations found that the effect sizes for all sorts of sex differences are typically relatively small, suggesting that men and women are more similar than dissimilar on a variety of psychological outcomes [88] . However, the authors cautioned that although such differences "are typically small, they should not be regarded as trivial, as even small effects can have important everyday consequences" (p. 17) [88] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, while the magnitude of sex differences in FEP may be small, a recent meta-synthesis of 106 meta-analyses of sex differences in nonclinical populations found that the effect sizes for all sorts of sex differences are typically relatively small, suggesting that men and women are more similar than dissimilar on a variety of psychological outcomes [88] . However, the authors cautioned that although such differences "are typically small, they should not be regarded as trivial, as even small effects can have important everyday consequences" (p. 17) [88] . Thus, it may well prove fruitful to continue to study the relationship between FEP and sex across the schizophrenia spectrum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innumerable studies looking at gender differences have been conducted in relation to a myriad of variables, ranging from driving (e.g., Zhang et al 2011) to the experience of emotions (e.g., Else-Quest et al 2012) and political preferences (e.g., Condon and Wichowsky 2015; for general overviews on gender differences see Hyde 2014, andZell et al 2015). Gender differences have also aroused the interest of scientometricians, who wish to know how similar or dissimilar men and women are regarding their scientific productivity (e.g., Larivière et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This second data file (Table S1) was used to estimate overlapping samples, similar to Zell, Krizan and Teeter (47). That is, meta-analyses were excluded if they were replaced by more recent metaanalyses addressing the same research question or covering the same topic or if they analysed only a subset of studies of another meta-analysis.…”
Section: Analytical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%