Evaluating Gaze and Touch Interaction and Two Feedback Techniques on a Large Display in a Shopping Environment

Kessels, Angelique; Loenen, Evert van; Lashina, Tatiana

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03655-2_66

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous work compared touch, mid-air gestures, and gaze as input modalities. Touch was compared with mid-air gestures for selecting targets on a large display [28], and with gaze for interacting with an intelligent shop window [29]. While touch was faster and less error prone, the authors noted promising potential for mid-air gestures and gaze given that technologies are becoming more robust and accurate.…”

Section: Touch Mid-air Gestures and Gaze Interactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

CueAuth

Khamis

Trotter

Mäkelä

et al. 2018

Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Secure authentication on situated displays (e.g., to access sensitive information or to make purchases) is becoming increasingly important. A promising approach to resist shoulder surfing attacks is to employ cues that users respond to while authenticating; this overwhelms observers by requiring them to observe both the cue itself as well as users' response to the cue. Although previous work proposed a variety of modalities, such as gaze and mid-air gestures, to further improve security, an understanding of how they compare with regard to usability and security is still missing as of today. In this paper, we rigorously compare modalities for cue-based authentication on situated displays. In particular, we provide the first comparison between touch, mid-air gestures, and calibration-free gaze using a state-of-the-art authentication concept. In two in-depth user studies (N=37) we found that the choice of touch or gaze presents a clear trade-off between usability and security. For example, while gaze input is more secure, it is also more demanding and requires longer authentication times. Mid-air gestures are slightly slower and more secure than touch but users hesitate to use them in public. We conclude with three significant design implications for authentication using touch, mid-air gestures, and gaze and discuss how the choice of modality creates opportunities and challenges for improved authentication in public. CCS Concepts: • Security and privacy → Authentication; • Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI); Interaction techniques; Interaction design;

show abstract

Section: Touch Mid-air Gestures and Gaze Interactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

CueAuth

Khamis

Trotter

Mäkelä

et al. 2018

Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…the Philips wake-up light, which are typical Ambient Intelligence information appliances, one could argue that the majority of alarms today are still stand alone 'dumb' devices no different to those available in the eighties. The specific example of projecting information on windows matching user's gaze and interest has been demonstrated since, e.g., see [24]; nevertheless windows and walls in most houses and shops do not embed interactive displays. Recently the public's imagination was captured by alternative technologies for superimposing a layer of information on physical surroundings such as Google glass, e.g., see the Cyclo device to provide contextualized information in the field of view of cyclists [30].…”

Section: Ubicomp: From Vision To Every Day Lifementioning

confidence: 99%

Ambient Intelligence: Vision, research, and life

Markopoulos

2016

AIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User

show abstract

“…Another aspect is control of lighting and simple robotic devices. An example of this is the Philips smart shop window (Kessels et al 2009) in which products rest on interactive turntables that rotate to present the products to the audience. Mobile robots, that is, robots that can walk or roll around, can also act as salespersons.…”

Section: Physical Computing / Roboticsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pervasive Advertising

Müller¹,

Alt²,

Michelis³

2011

Pervasive Advertising

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As pervasive computing technologies leave the labs, they are starting to be used for the purpose of advertising. Pervasive Advertising has the potential to affect everyone's life, but it seems that a knowledge gap is preventing us from shaping this development in a meaningful way. In particular, many marketing and advertising professionals have an expert understanding of their trade, but are unaware of recent advances in pervasive computing technologies, the opportunities they offer, and the challenges they pose. Similarly, many pervasive computing researchers and professionals are on top of the recent technological advances, but lack basic marketing and advertising expertise and therefore an understanding of how their technology can influence these fields. This book is intended to close this gap and provide the means to meaningfully shape the future of pervasive advertising.

show abstract

Evaluating Gaze and Touch Interaction and Two Feedback Techniques on a Large Display in a Shopping Environment

Cited by 5 publications

References 7 publications

CueAuth

CueAuth

Ambient Intelligence: Vision, research, and life

Pervasive Advertising

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About