1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7679.1994.tb00061.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Futures Exchanges in Liberalising Economies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the costs of such a policy are very high, not only in simple cash terms but also in opportunity cost terms, especially to an economy seeking rapid but sustainable growth. As Leuthold (1994) argues, in many respects the advantages of trading on offshore markets far outweigh the costs and especially where the commodity concerned is internationally traded, then there really is only one option and that is to trade on well-established, highly-liquid offshore exchanges.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the costs of such a policy are very high, not only in simple cash terms but also in opportunity cost terms, especially to an economy seeking rapid but sustainable growth. As Leuthold (1994) argues, in many respects the advantages of trading on offshore markets far outweigh the costs and especially where the commodity concerned is internationally traded, then there really is only one option and that is to trade on well-established, highly-liquid offshore exchanges.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the existence of a futures market does not necessarily mean that it will be successful. The preconditions for the success of a futures market need to be analyzed and the constraints must be identified and examined (Leuthold, 1994).…”
Section: Brazilian Electricity Futures Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the predictability of the basis is crucial for attracting hedgers, as increased basis risk impairs the risk management capacity of futures trading (Leuthold 1994;Garcia and Sanders 1996).…”
Section: Institutional Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%