2008
DOI: 10.1002/met.58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating forecasts of extreme events for hydrological applications: an approach for screening unfamiliar performance measures

Abstract: Many different performance measures have been developed to evaluate field predictions in meteorology. However, a researcher or practitioner encountering a new or unfamiliar measure may have difficulty in interpreting its results, which may lead to them avoiding new measures and relying on those that are familiar. In the context of evaluating forecasts of extreme events for hydrological applications, this article aims to promote the use of a range of performance measures. Some of the types of performance measur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important that the forcing of the model cascade is evaluated in a hydrologically meaningful way (Cloke and Pappenberger, 2008;Pappenberger et al, 2008b). In this case study the input precipitation fields were evaluated on a monthly basis using continuous ranked probability scores (CRPS) (Hersbach, 2000).…”
Section: Precipitation Map Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important that the forcing of the model cascade is evaluated in a hydrologically meaningful way (Cloke and Pappenberger, 2008;Pappenberger et al, 2008b). In this case study the input precipitation fields were evaluated on a monthly basis using continuous ranked probability scores (CRPS) (Hersbach, 2000).…”
Section: Precipitation Map Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ensemble of weather forecasts from one Ensemble Prediction System (EPS), when used on catchment hydrology, can provide improved early flood warning as some of the uncertainties can be quantified (Cloke and Pappenberger, 2008). Recent research has been conducted in real-time flood forecasting using such EPSs in conjunction with spatially distributed catchment models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also quite different uses in different domains of the environmental sciences. In meteorological modeling it is standard practice to present information on different model verification statistics in the evaluation of weather forecasts [e.g., Pappenberger et al, 2008;Cloke and Pappenberger, 2008]. In other domains, model verification is normally only used for the evidence that a computer code is consistent with the definition of the model concepts that it purports to represent, without any requirement that the resulting outputs will be consistent with observations in a particular application.…”
Section: The Language Of Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cloke and Pappenberger, 2008). We use two measures of skill to verify forecasts at larger streamflow thresholds: the Brier score and the loglikelihood ratio.…”
Section: Accuracy Of Forecasts For Large Threshold Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%