2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Forecasting Methods by Considering Different Accuracy Measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a number of evaluation criteria including MAE, MSE, RMSE and MAPE [37][38][39] are proposed to evaluate the forecasting performances. To begin with, we define x as the forecasting values of a model, ref as the observed true values and t = 48 which means 48 points are required to predict within a day.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a number of evaluation criteria including MAE, MSE, RMSE and MAPE [37][38][39] are proposed to evaluate the forecasting performances. To begin with, we define x as the forecasting values of a model, ref as the observed true values and t = 48 which means 48 points are required to predict within a day.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shock score is a scoring that tells if there is an abnormality in blood circulation which result in hypertension and tachycardia. Research conducted by [5,12] also conclude that Rockall scores shows medical shock to be one of the risk factor of mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Similarly, [18] also point out that rebleeding is an important factor of mortality and occurs in 10-30% of successfully treated patients. Research conducted by [5] and [12] also concluded that rebleeding is an influential factor of mortality. Even though there are advance treatments available in treating patients with UGIB, rebleed remains the life-threatening factor of UGIB patients [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Clearly, there is a need for an algorithm of decision making for selecting the best prediction models by consid-ering several accuracy measures simultaneously. Mehdiyev et al (2016) proposed a multi-criteria decision analysis approach for solving this problem.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%