2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-6593.2011.00253.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating fluorescence and ultraviolet photometry to assess dissolved organic matter removal during coagulation–flocculation

Abstract: Ultraviolet absorption at 254 nm (UV 254 ) and peaks (A, C and T) fluorescence intensities were evaluated to assess dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal during coagulation-flocculation. The consistency of fluorescence data was checked to ensure that no inner filter effect, quenching or enhanced intensities affected the data. The decreases in UV 254 and peak intensities were calculated in percentage terms between raw and clarified water and compared with measured DOC removal. The results indicate that peak A,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detection was by UV absorbance (at 260 nm, HPSEC-UV) and fluorescence. For the HPSEC-fluorescence method applied, emitted light at 330 nm was measured after excitation at 280 nm (λex280 and λem 330 nm) to identify and quantify protein-like (including tryptophan-like and phenol-like) materials (Peak T) (Leenheer and Croué, 2003;Lanciné et al, 2011). For humic-like materials, λex320 and λem430 nm (Peak C1) were used, as detailed by Bridgeman et al (2011).…”
Section: Water Quality Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection was by UV absorbance (at 260 nm, HPSEC-UV) and fluorescence. For the HPSEC-fluorescence method applied, emitted light at 330 nm was measured after excitation at 280 nm (λex280 and λem 330 nm) to identify and quantify protein-like (including tryptophan-like and phenol-like) materials (Peak T) (Leenheer and Croué, 2003;Lanciné et al, 2011). For humic-like materials, λex320 and λem430 nm (Peak C1) were used, as detailed by Bridgeman et al (2011).…”
Section: Water Quality Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%