1977
DOI: 10.1002/he.36919771707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating faculty development programs

Abstract: The evaluation of afaculty dtveiopinent program should include the nature of tlw program and how it interacts with the largcr univmity, as well as the acromplishnirrit of preypecijed objectiws.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After analyzing the academic program reviews of psychology departmental consultants, Korn, Sweetman, and Nodine (1996) concluded that there was no common understanding about the criteria by which to evaluate psychology programs. The authors lamented the absence of a rubric that could assist programs and reviewers in accomplishing academic program reviews, an increasingly common practice in higher education (Bogue & Saunders, 1992; Wergin, 2003; Wergin & Swingen, 2000). To fill this void, this article proposes a rubric for program review in psychology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After analyzing the academic program reviews of psychology departmental consultants, Korn, Sweetman, and Nodine (1996) concluded that there was no common understanding about the criteria by which to evaluate psychology programs. The authors lamented the absence of a rubric that could assist programs and reviewers in accomplishing academic program reviews, an increasingly common practice in higher education (Bogue & Saunders, 1992; Wergin, 2003; Wergin & Swingen, 2000). To fill this void, this article proposes a rubric for program review in psychology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But due to its marginal status (Wergin, 1977) this is only possible on a small scale. However, while working only with individual staffis impractical and institutional involvement is restricted, group work is feasible and groups are indeed preferable as clients or collaborators in staff development activities.…”
Section: Ill Centrally Organised Staff Development At the Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one of the few analyses of faculty development program evaluation, Jon F. Wergin (1977) confirms that" ... Evaluation should reflect the nature of the program."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, we were persuaded by Wergin's strong advocacy of the case study method, which can make use of all historical documentation in addition to data "from both the consumer's and the practitioner's view." Such an in-depth analysis relies on data-gathering from a variety of sources and a careful analysis based on "convergence of findings" and "probable explanations of disagreements" (Wergin 1977).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%