2021
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating esophageal motility beyond primary peristalsis: Assessing esophagogastric junction opening mechanics and secondary peristalsis in patients with normal manometry

Abstract: Background Functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) Panometry assesses the esophageal response to distention and may complement the assessment of primary peristalsis on high‐resolution manometry (HRM). We aimed to investigate whether FLIP Panometry provides complementary information in patients with normal esophageal motility on HRM. Methods Adult patients that completed FLIP and had an HRM classification of normal motility were retrospectively identified for inclusion. 16‐cm FLIP studies performed during endos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
88
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
88
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This was demonstrated in a study focused on symptomatic patients with normal motility on HRM (ie, normal primary peristalsis and normal deglutitive EGJ pressures) that described FLIP Panometry findings in this cohort. 21 Overall, 73% of patients (120/164) with normal HRM had normal EGJ opening and 77% patients (126/164) had antegrade contractions on FLIP (NCR or BCR). 21 Thus, abnormal secondary peristalsis in this cohort of symptomatic patients with normal primary peristalsis was observed at similar rates as the aforementioned studies that compared secondary and primary peristalsis on manometry.…”
Section: Correlation and Differences Between Flip And High-resolution Manometrymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This was demonstrated in a study focused on symptomatic patients with normal motility on HRM (ie, normal primary peristalsis and normal deglutitive EGJ pressures) that described FLIP Panometry findings in this cohort. 21 Overall, 73% of patients (120/164) with normal HRM had normal EGJ opening and 77% patients (126/164) had antegrade contractions on FLIP (NCR or BCR). 21 Thus, abnormal secondary peristalsis in this cohort of symptomatic patients with normal primary peristalsis was observed at similar rates as the aforementioned studies that compared secondary and primary peristalsis on manometry.…”
Section: Correlation and Differences Between Flip And High-resolution Manometrymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…21 Overall, 73% of patients (120/164) with normal HRM had normal EGJ opening and 77% patients (126/164) had antegrade contractions on FLIP (NCR or BCR). 21 Thus, abnormal secondary peristalsis in this cohort of symptomatic patients with normal primary peristalsis was observed at similar rates as the aforementioned studies that compared secondary and primary peristalsis on manometry. 34,35 Of interest however, was that when the subset of this cohort that completed TBE was examined (n = 64), abnormal retention on TBE was associated with abnormal EGJ opening, suggesting the potential for the clinical significance of abnormal EGJ opening in the setting of normal deglutitive EGJ pressures.…”
Section: Correlation and Differences Between Flip And High-resolution Manometrymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations