2018
DOI: 10.1080/15366367.2018.1483663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Equating in Progress Monitoring Measures Using Multilevel Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a large magnitude of error in ORF scores can be crucial, especially for students who are identified to be at risk of poor reading outcomes. Moreover, it would be difficult to distinguish the change of ORF scores due to true student growth versus passage dissimilarity, which would jeopardize the validity of longitudinal ORF assessments (Albano et al, 2018; Albano & Rodriguez, 2012). Thus, test developers of ORF assessments need to correct for varying passage difficulties with appropriate methods for more precise measurement of ORF.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a large magnitude of error in ORF scores can be crucial, especially for students who are identified to be at risk of poor reading outcomes. Moreover, it would be difficult to distinguish the change of ORF scores due to true student growth versus passage dissimilarity, which would jeopardize the validity of longitudinal ORF assessments (Albano et al, 2018; Albano & Rodriguez, 2012). Thus, test developers of ORF assessments need to correct for varying passage difficulties with appropriate methods for more precise measurement of ORF.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%