Evaluating enjoyment, presence, and emulator sickness in VR games based on first‐ and third‐ person viewing perspectives

Monteiro, Diego; Li, Ziming; Xu, Wenge; Brucker, Marvin; Nanjappan, Vijayakumar; Yue, Yong

doi:10.1002/cav.1830

Cited by 59 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Christensen, Mathiesen, Poulsen, Ustrup & Kraus (2018) explored a competitive multiplayer game for desktop, HMD with joystick and HMD with magic wands conditions and exposed that HMD versions provide significantly higher scores for many of the measures in a multidimensional game user experience questionnaire, such as immersion, flow, positive affect, empathy, and behavioral involvement. Monteiro et al (2018) evaluated a car racing game for 3 rd person view on desktop versus first-person view with HMD and reported a slightly higher level of immersion for HMD gameplay. Roettl & Terlutter (2018) showed that their jump-and-run action game yielded a higher sense of presence when played in the HMD VR than in the stereoscopic 3D than in the 2D video game, but they did not explore any effect on arousal or attitude towards the video game.…”

Section: Related Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Kim et al, 2014;Kober et al, 2012), ITC Sense of Presence Inventory (Lessiter, Freeman, Keogh, & Davidoff, 2001) in (Lugrin et al, 2013;Wilson & Mayhorn, 2019). In order to assess game user experience with a standardized scale, Game Experience Questionnaire (IJsselsteijn, de Kort, & Poels, 2007) was employed in (Christensen et al, 2018;McMahan et al, 2012;Monteiro et al, 2018) and Game User Experience Satisfaction Scale (Phan et al, 2016) was used in (Carroll et al, 2019;Shelstad et al, 2017;C. Yildirim et al, 2018).…”

Section: Measuring Ux In Comparison Of Displays Systems For Virtual Ementioning

confidence: 99%

“…In order to evaluate cybersickness, which is a detrimental negative effect of VR systems based on visually induced motion sickness, was assessed using Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (Kennedy, Lane, Berbaum, & Lilienthal, 1993) in many of the studies (Christensen et al, 2018;K. Kim et al, 2014;Mania & Chalmers, 2001;Monteiro et al, 2018;Zanbaka et al, 2005).…”

Section: Measuring Ux In Comparison Of Displays Systems For Virtual Ementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Comparison of VR and Desktop Game User Experience in a Puzzle Game: “Keep Talking and Nobody Explodes”

Berkman¹,

Çatak²,

Eremektar³

2020

AJIT-e

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the contemporary game production process is based on the Integrated Development Environment (IDE) applications, it is easier for developers to create multiple versions of their game for both VR and desktop platforms. This provided a great opportunity for researchers to conduct comparative studies to explore the user experience of the relatively novel virtual reality applications In this study, we evaluated a puzzle game through a within-subjects experiment design using objective measures of game success and gameplay duration, as well as plenty of subjective measures in order to assess game user experience, comparing desktop and VR. In addition to selected dimensions of GUESS (Game User Experience Satisfaction Scale), we employed MEC-SPQ (Measurement Effects Conditions - Spatial Presence Questionnaire) to measure presence. Furthermore, we employed NASA-TLX (NASA Task Load Index) to compare the perceived task complexity of the same task executed in VR and desktop gaming environments. Results revealed that there is not a significant difference in objective measures of player performance, comparing the VR and desktop gameplay. The Game User Experience Satisfaction Scale did not reveal any significant difference between the mean scores of VR and desktop experiences. The spatial presence related dimensions of MEC-SPQ revealed significantly higher scores of VR, for Possible Actions and Self Location dimensions. NASA-TLX weighted scores were significantly higher for VR in physical load and for desktop in frustration. Our results show that a puzzle-based game experienced in VR does not lead to a higher level of satisfaction in terms of game user experience but triggers a sense of spatial presence. Due to the different control schemes, players perceive that HMD based gameplay demands more physical task load. However, the gameplay duration and game success rate are not significantly different. The failure in desktop gameplay might have led to higher frustration, since the experience seems more familiar to players. Since the results are partially concordant with previous studies, it is not possible to make a strict conclusion on the effect caused by different immersive technologies on game user experience. Further studies are required through a more consistent methodology with a focus on game design components rather than game genre.

show abstract

Section: Related Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Measuring Ux In Comparison Of Displays Systems For Virtual Ementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Measuring Ux In Comparison Of Displays Systems For Virtual Ementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of VR and Desktop Game User Experience in a Puzzle Game: “Keep Talking and Nobody Explodes”

Berkman¹,

Çatak²,

Eremektar³

2020

AJIT-e

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Finally, one limitation of Study One was that participants also experienced a greater sense of VR sickness in the 1PP than 3PP conditions (for similar results see Monteiro et al, 2018), which may have inadvertently distracted participants from focusing on the main experimental task. In Study Two, we reduced the potential influence of VR sickness in two ways.…”

Section: Study One: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

How Third-Person Experiences in Immersive Virtual Reality Influence Memory

Iriye¹,

Jacques²

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We typically experience the world from a first-person perspective (1PP), but can sometimes experience events from a third-person perspective (3PP) much as an observer might see us.Little is known about how visual perspective influences the formation of memories for events.We developed an immersive virtual reality paradigm to examine how visual perspective during encoding influences memories. Participants explored immersive virtual environments from first-person and third-person avatar perspectives while wearing an Oculus Rift headset.Memory was tested immediately (Study One) or following a one-week delay (Study Two). There were no differences in the accuracy of visual information across the two studies, but 3PP experiences increased spatial memory accuracy compared to 1PP experiences. Our results demonstrate that 3PP experiences create 3PP memories, as reflected by an increase in subjective ratings of observer-like perspectives during remembering. In sum, visual perspective is important for determining how memories are formed and later remembered.

show abstract

“…On the other hand, we speculate that the third-person point of view offered by videos improves self-efficacy although there is no direct evidence. As VR has a stronger immersion sense than screen images on the third-person point of view [13], we expect the playback in a virtual environment can improve self-efficacy. Therefore, the effect of immersion of VR on self-reflection needs to be clarified.…”

Section: Videotape Feedbackmentioning

confidence: 99%