2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating electricity sector reforms in Argentina: lessons for developing countries?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Electricity capacity expansion planning generally tends to be based on some type of leastcost optimisation given various constraints that mirror existing physical infrastructure conditions, Elshafei, 1979, Garcia et al, 2008, Ghanadan and Koomey, 2005, Güven, 1994, Hart and Jacobson, 2011, Heinrich et al, 2007, Kobos et al, 2006, Pokharel and Chandrashekar, 1998, Psarras et al, 1990, Rachmatullah et al, 2007, Rath-Nagel and Voss, 1981, Samouilidis and Berahas, 1983, Shrestha and Bhattarai, 1994, Silva and Nakata, 2009, Spinney and Watkins, 1996, St. Denis and Parker, 2009, Turkson, 1990, Voropai and Ivanova, 2002, and Wu et al, 2000. 7 See e.g., Arango and Larsen, 2011, Auriol and Blanc, 2009, Dubash, 2003, Gillwald, 2005, Gratwick and Eberhard, 2008, Gualberti et al, 2009, Habtetsion and Tsighe, 2007, Haselip, 2007, Haselip and Hilson, 2005, Haselip and Potter, 2010, Jamasb, 2006, Malgas and Eberhard, 2011, Mebratu and Wamukonya, 2007, Nagayama, 2007, Nagayama, 2009, Nagayama and Kashiwagi, 2007, Nyoike, 2002, Patlitzianas et al, 2006…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electricity capacity expansion planning generally tends to be based on some type of leastcost optimisation given various constraints that mirror existing physical infrastructure conditions, Elshafei, 1979, Garcia et al, 2008, Ghanadan and Koomey, 2005, Güven, 1994, Hart and Jacobson, 2011, Heinrich et al, 2007, Kobos et al, 2006, Pokharel and Chandrashekar, 1998, Psarras et al, 1990, Rachmatullah et al, 2007, Rath-Nagel and Voss, 1981, Samouilidis and Berahas, 1983, Shrestha and Bhattarai, 1994, Silva and Nakata, 2009, Spinney and Watkins, 1996, St. Denis and Parker, 2009, Turkson, 1990, Voropai and Ivanova, 2002, and Wu et al, 2000. 7 See e.g., Arango and Larsen, 2011, Auriol and Blanc, 2009, Dubash, 2003, Gillwald, 2005, Gratwick and Eberhard, 2008, Gualberti et al, 2009, Habtetsion and Tsighe, 2007, Haselip, 2007, Haselip and Hilson, 2005, Haselip and Potter, 2010, Jamasb, 2006, Malgas and Eberhard, 2011, Mebratu and Wamukonya, 2007, Nagayama, 2007, Nagayama, 2009, Nagayama and Kashiwagi, 2007, Nyoike, 2002, Patlitzianas et al, 2006…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integration of distribution, transmission, distribution, and retail services Japan [23], France [8] Integration of generation, distribution and retail services while independent of transmission UK [24] Integration of distribution and retail services while independent of generation and transmission India [25], Brazil [2] Integration of generation and retail services while independent of distribution and transmission New Zealand [26] Integration of transmission and distribution while independent of generation and retail services Canada [27] Integration of generation and retail while integrating distribution and transmission Australia [7] At the second stage of the 2015 reform in China's power industry, the distribution section is open to the private capitals gradually and the power generation planning except for the public coordination can be marketization [28,29]. In this situation, China's power industry can develop the schema of "integration of generation, distribution and retail services while independent of transmission" as well.…”
Section: Schema Representative Countrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the 1980s, restructured reforms of the power industry were first launched in the United Kingdom and some Latin American countries, and achieved momentum in 1990s [1,2]. The major purposes of the restructure were to reduce electricity prices through competition, provide consumers with more sufficient and reliable services, and create more commercial opportunities for private capitals [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of eighties and early nineties, some countries from the Latin American region reformed and liberalized their electric systems . This process was initiated in Chile in 1982, and followed by Argentina, Peru, Bolivia, Colombia, Panamá, El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Honduras, Brazil, Venezuela, Mexico, and Ecuador, and took them to a deep transformation of the energy (and electricity) sectors .…”
Section: Comparing Enabling Framework Legislation and Renewables Dmentioning
confidence: 99%