2020
DOI: 10.2478/jas-2020-0025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Efficacy of Fumagilin-B® Against Nosemosis and Tracking Seasonal Trends of Nosema spp. in Nova Scotia Honey Bee Colonies

Abstract: The efficacy of the antimicrobial Fumagilin-B® against nosemosis was evaluated in both spring and autumn feeding treatments following label directions in seventy-two honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies across three apiaries in Nova Scotia, Canada. The seasonal trend of Nosema spp. spore loads was also tracked in these same colonies throughout a thirteen-month period (February 2018 – March 2019). We found the spring Fumagilin-B® treatment to be effective at significantly suppressing Nosema spp. spore levels bel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On day 9, and at the end of the experiment (on day 15), the highest spore load was in the infected but not treated (I) group as compared to the treated group ( Figure 3 ), indicating the anti- Nosema effect of the applied treatments. For fumagillin, the highest spore number (excluding the I group) was in the group treated from day 6 (I-F6), and the lowest was in the group treated from day 1 (I-F1), which proves the direct relation between fumagillin treatment and the number of Nosema spores, confirming the known anti- Nosema effect of fumagillin [ 3 , 28 , 45 , 57 , 85 , 86 , 87 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On day 9, and at the end of the experiment (on day 15), the highest spore load was in the infected but not treated (I) group as compared to the treated group ( Figure 3 ), indicating the anti- Nosema effect of the applied treatments. For fumagillin, the highest spore number (excluding the I group) was in the group treated from day 6 (I-F6), and the lowest was in the group treated from day 1 (I-F1), which proves the direct relation between fumagillin treatment and the number of Nosema spores, confirming the known anti- Nosema effect of fumagillin [ 3 , 28 , 45 , 57 , 85 , 86 , 87 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Moreover, fumagillin showed a beneficial effect in terms of reducing some negative effects of Nosema infection (by decreasing Nosema loads and consequently preventing Nosema -induced immune suppression and oxidative stress). Bearing in mind the observed negative effects of fumagillin and the absence of registered fumagillin formulations in Europe [ 45 , 46 ], it is justified to look for a natural alternative for Nosema control. The positive protective effect of completely natural A. blazei extract proven in this research shows potential in combatting Nosema and deserves to be further investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Greater stimulation of gene expression in group I-Abs1 and I-Abs3 compared to I-Abs6 indicates better efficacy of the extract before and at the moment of infection with N. ceranae. A better protective effect is expected as the extract is rich in polysaccharides [5,[36][37][38], while the anti-Nosema effect is more typical for antibiotics such as fumagillin [5,29,30,[33][34][35]. Moreover, we used crude water extract which, besides polysaccharides (almost 70%), contains proteins (5.31%) and phenolic compounds (2.7%) as well [71,81].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control of nosemosis includes a wide range of beekeeping practices [3] and application of chemicals, such as fumagillin, an antibiotic derived from the fungus Aspergillus fumigatus [26,27]. Although fumagillin use is prohibited in most of European countries due to risk of its commercial formulations (Fumagilin-B, Fumidil-B,) to leave residues in bee products [28][29][30], to affect food safety [31,32], and to increase bee mortality [30], however, it is still licensed in the United States [33], Canada [34], and Argentina [35]. Moreover, its effectiveness has been questioned [28], imposing a constant effort of scientists to discover alternative substances, which would be effective against Nosema spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%