2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2016.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating effects of rescaling and weighting data on habitat suitability modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Xue et al. ). Using this method, weights were assigned to each environmental variable corresponding to its relative contribution (%) to the deviance explained in the BRT model (Xue et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…; Xue et al. ). Using this method, weights were assigned to each environmental variable corresponding to its relative contribution (%) to the deviance explained in the BRT model (Xue et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Using this method, weights were assigned to each environmental variable corresponding to its relative contribution (%) to the deviance explained in the BRT model (Xue et al. ). The BRTs were developed with the “gbm.step” function within the R package “gbm” (Ridgeway ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the 2015 benchmark assessment, both spring and fall surveys were assumed to have a linear catchability relationship that remained constant during 2000-2014 (ASMFC 2015a). Therefore, lobster catch density in this study was used as a proxy for distribution and abundance, which assumed that lobster catches reflected the presence/absence and density of the species at a given location within the study area, and not confounded by bias associated D r a f t with sampling efficiency and environmental variability (Chang et al 2010;ASMFC 2015a;Tanaka and Chen 2016;Xue et al 2017).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habitat suitability index (HSI) modeling has become a broadly used and powerful tool to provide habitat preference information, which usually combines abundance index (AI) and oceanographic variables (such as temperature, salinity, CHLA, oxygen concentration, etc.) using a variety of different methods (Chen et al, 2009;Tian et al, 2009;Chang et al, 2013;Tanaka and Chen, 2015;Yu et al, 2016aYu et al, ,b, 2019Xue et al, 2017). The spatial distribution of cephalopods in the YS and the relationship between their AI and oceanographic variables, especially for non-target species, are rarely known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%